Mission Nursing Home
Plymouth, Minnesota · CCN 245546
34 surveys since 2011, 7 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 166
- Surveys
- 34
- Harm or worse
- 7
- Immediate jeopardy
- 3
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 70
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Hennepin
- Medicare-certified since
- 1991
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 52 not-for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Minnesota.
Last survey on record
May 22, 2026
171 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 1.09 | 4.39 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.32 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 24.0% | 37.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $14,015 across 1 penalty
- Abuse icon
- Flagged by CMS on Care Compare
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G26.1% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2575.8% | E26.1% | F412.1% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8804×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F6893×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F5502×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F6842×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F6862×
Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Mission Nursing Home, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600May 27, 2021
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to assess and implement interventions for 1 of 1 residents (R1) with escalating behaviors, including a newly recorded incident of physical assault. These findings resulted in an immediate jeopardy (IJ) situation for R2 and potentially other residents who R1 may become verbally or physically aggressive with. The IJ began on 5/12/2021, at 4:26 p.m. when R1, who had a documented history of verbal aggression and threatening behavior, hit R2 on the right side of the face. R1 was subsequently removed from the facility by law enforcement for a felony arrest warrant and was returned to the facility on [DATE] at 6:15 p.m. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF600Feb 25, 2026
Based on interview and document review the facility failed to protect 1 of 1 resident (R1) from staff to resident abuse when R1 was physically and verbally abused by nursing aid (NA)-A which resulted in psychosocial harm to R1 who was crying and visibly upset during the abuse incident. The facility implemented corrective action, and the deficient practice was corrected on 2/19/26, prior to the survey and was issued at past non-compliance. Findings include: R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 had diagnoses of stroke and cancer with prognosis less than six months to live. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF697Apr 10, 2025
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure pain medications were re-ordered and available for administration per physician orders for 1 of 3 residents (R2), who had chronic pain and utilized pain medication. This resulted in actual harm when R2 was not administered the physicians ordered pain medication before a pre-scheduled surgery prior to leaving the facility for surgery, and arrived at the surgery center tearful and in severe pain. The facility implemented immediate corrective action prior to the survey and was therefore issued at past non-compliance. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF867Mar 12, 2025
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a plan that defined measurable goals and create a system to collect feedback from resident and resident representatives. This had the potential to affect all 56 residents in the facility. Findings Include: During entrance interview on 3/10/25 at 12:54 p.m., a request for a copy of the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) plan was made to the director of nursing (DON). On 3/13/25 at 1:37 p.m., another request was made for a copy of the QAPI plan. On 3/13/25 at 2:25 p.m., the facility's QAPI program policy was provided. On 3/12/25 at 2:44 p.m., the director of nursing (DON) provided meeting minutes for the last four quarters, but failed to provide an overall plan. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF851May 31, 2024
Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to submit complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data, during 1 of 1 quarter reviewed (quarter one), to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) according to specifications established by CMS. Findings include: Review of the facility Payroll Based Journal Report (PBJ) [NAME] Report 1705 D for quarter one (10/1/23 to 12/31/23) identified a 1-star staffing rating and failure to submit PBJ data. […]
Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 166 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- May 22, 2026Standard3 findings
- Mar 5, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Feb 25, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Feb 11, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Jan 8, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Jul 3, 2025Complaint3 findings
- Apr 10, 2025Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 12, 2025Standard3 findings
Show the 26 earlier surveys
- May 31, 2024Standard15 findings
- Apr 24, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Dec 13, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Jul 12, 2023Standard1 finding
- Aug 24, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Mar 24, 2022Standard1 finding
- May 27, 2021Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 15, 2020Complaint2 findings
- Sep 28, 2020Complaint1 finding
- May 7, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Jan 9, 2020Standard7 findings
- Aug 28, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Jul 3, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Oct 19, 2018Standard7 findings
- Jul 9, 2018Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Dec 8, 2017Standard16 findings
- Sep 18, 2017Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Mar 3, 2017Standard7 findings
- May 17, 2016Standard16 findings · 1 harm
- Apr 16, 2015Standard10 findings
- Jul 29, 2014Complaint1 finding
- May 6, 2014Complaint2 findings
- Jan 9, 2014—7 findings
- Mar 8, 2013—14 findings
- Jul 31, 2012—15 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 1, 2011—14 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction