Deficiency Index

Lindengrove Waukesha

Waukesha, Wisconsin · CCN 525422

21 surveys since 2011, 12 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
105
Surveys
21
Harm or worse
12
Immediate jeopardy
7
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy7

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file15/21

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
61
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Waukesha
Medicare-certified since
1989

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
1
Staffing
3
Quality measures
1

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 52 not-for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Wisconsin.

Last survey on record

Jan 21, 2026

292 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.984.48
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.93—
Annual nurse turnover70.8%49.3%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$204,321 across 2 penalties

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ24.3%K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD3778.7%E612.8%F12.1%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C12.1%
CMS’s current file: 47 of the 105 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6864×

    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.

  • F6563×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6843×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F6893×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F5522×

    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Lindengrove Waukesha, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Sep 25, 2025

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 4 (R13, R2, R8, and R19) of 6 residents reviewed for falls. * R13 experienced 2 falls on 7/18/25 and was sent to the emergency room. R13 was diagnosed with blunt head trauma, forehead laceration requiring sutures, and traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (bleeding on the brain). When R13 returned to the facility, R13 fell an additional 8 times between 7/18/25 through 9/7/25. Two of these falls resulted in R13 hitting his head again and required steri-strips to close the wounds. The 10 falls that R13 experienced at the facility were not thoroughly investigated and did not determine a root cause for R13's falls. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF686Jun 11, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure residents with a pressure injury or at risk for pressure injuries received necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent the development of pressure injuries and to promote healing for 1 (R8) of 3 residents reviewed for pressure injuries. R8 admitted to the facility with pressure injuries (PIs) on her left heel and right lateral foot which later resolved. R8 was assessed as high risk for PIs. Despite being at high risk, R8's physician's order for an air mattress was not implemented, a care plan for actual skin impairment was not initiated timely, and her weekly skin assessments were not completed weekly as per facility policy. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Mar 27, 2024

    Based on record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who was admitted without a pressure injury was properly assessed and monitored to prevent the development of a pressure injury for one resident (Resident (R) 5) out of three residents reviewed for pressure injuries. This resulted in the development of a facility acquired, stage 3 pressure injury. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Pressure Injury-Prevention and Managing Skin Integrity dated 08/10/2023 indicated, 3. Skin Checks: a. Skin checks will be done upon admission, readmission or as clinically indicated. b. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jun 11, 2024

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not follow proper sanitation and food handling practices in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the kitchen and 1 of 2 serving areas with the potential to affect 44 residents. * Garbage cans in the kitchen were observed to be very soiled and a lid was not on a garbage can next to a food preparation area. * Multiple items in the kitchen were found to be undated and several were uncovered. * The handwashing sink in the kitchen was very dirty. * The serving area on the second floor was found to have a mop and bucket with dirty water next to a cart for food trays. * Several food storage bins were observed to have the scoop stored inside the bin in direct contact with the product. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jan 4, 2022

    Based on observation, record review, and interview the Facility did not ensure that food was prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Observations were made of the main facility kitchen as well as a satellite kitchen which is used to prepare and serve meals to the residents. Observations were made of expired items, food stored on the floor of the freezer, garbage cans without closing lids and the ice maker which needed to be cleaned. This deficient practice has the potential to affect 4 of the 4 residents who eat and receive their meals from the main serving kitchen and satellite kitchen. […]

Read 30 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 30 of 105 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jan 21, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 25, 2025Standard and complaint13 findings · 1 harm
  • May 29, 2025Complaint3 findings
  • Jun 11, 2024Standard and complaint20 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 27, 2024Complaint5 findings · 1 harm
  • Feb 13, 2023Standard5 findings
  • Jan 4, 2022Standard4 findings
  • Jun 11, 2021Complaint1 finding
Show the 13 earlier surveys
  • Nov 9, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Nov 6, 2019Standard5 findings
  • May 1, 2019Complaint3 findings · 3 harm
  • Mar 21, 2019Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Sep 13, 2018Standard and complaint9 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 11, 2017Standard4 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 12, 2016Standard and complaint12 findings
  • Oct 8, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 26, 2015Standard and complaint11 findings · 2 harm
  • May 21, 2014Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • May 22, 2013—1 finding
  • Jul 31, 2012—2 findings
  • Jun 24, 2011—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction