Newcastle Place
Mequon, Wisconsin · CCN 525668
27 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2014.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 99
- Surveys
- 27
- Harm or worse
- 7
- Immediate jeopardy
- 2
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 47
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- LIFESPACE COMMUNITIES
- County
- Ozaukee
- Medicare-certified since
- 2003
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 52 not-for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Wisconsin.
Last survey on record
May 20, 2026
173 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 5.22 | 4.48 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.10 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 43.2% | 49.3% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $8,281 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J12.3% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G12.3% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D3376.7% | E511.6% | F37.0% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6895×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F6073×
Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
- F6093×
Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
- F6103×
Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
- F6843×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Newcastle Place, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Jul 31, 2025
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure adequate supervision for 1 resident (R) (R7) of 3 residents reviewed for elopement.R7 was assessed as at risk for elopement and had a WanderGuard on R7's left ankle. R7 lived on the second floor of the facility and had multiple documented attempts of entering the emergency exit stairwell near R7's room. The facility's WanderGuard system did not work with emergency exit stairwell doors. R7 expressed a desire to jump down the stairwell and staff used medical equipment to block the stairwell and divert R7 from the door. On 5/31/25, R7 exited the building via the stairwell and was found outside near an employee parking lot. The facility did not complete an investigation into R7's elopement. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Apr 22, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 4 of 6 residents (R) reviewed for accidents (R3, R5, R8, and R7.) R3's and R5's examples rise to the severity/scope level of G. *R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 12/24/25, facility staff assessed R3 to be at high risk for falls. Facility staff did not initiate resident specific fall interventions for R3. According to facility staff, R3 was confused and wandering during the overnight shift. On 12/25/25 at 6:45 AM, R3 was found lying on the floor in R3's room. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812May 20, 2026
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review the facility did not ensure food was stored and prepared in a safe and sanitary manner. This practice had the potential to affect all 38 residents residing in the facility. Hand hygiene was not appropriately completed during dishwashing.Food temperatures were not consistently completed.The facility did not have logs for the 3-compartment sink and sanitizing buckets. Bowls in the kitchen were not stored upside down or covered. The stove was not thoroughly cleaned.Findings include:On 5/18/26 at 9:35 AM, Surveyor completed an initial kitchen tour. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Feb 26, 2025
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food was stored and prepared in a safe and sanitary manner. The practice had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Staff did not wear hair or beard restraints in the kitchen and kitchenettes. Staff did not have ensure the dishwasher rinse cycle reached the required temperature. In addition, staff did not document dishwasher surface temperatures to ensure proper sanitization. Staff did not test the quaternary sanitizing solution per manufacturer's instructions. Findings include: During an initial kitchen tour that began at 9:11 AM on 2/24/25, Director of Culinary Service (DCS)-D indicated the facility follows the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Dec 13, 2023
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food was stored and prepared in a sanitary manner. This practice had the potential to affect all 41 residents residing in the facility. The kitchen cooler and dry storage area contained multiple open, undated, and/or expired food items. In addition, one food item was stored uncovered and open to air. The facility did not follow safe food cooling protocol. Staff did not follow appropriate hand hygiene procedures when they prepared/served food. Findings include: On [DATE], Sous Chef (SC)-M verified the facility follows the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code as their standard of practice. 1. […]
Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 99 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- May 20, 2026Standard2 findings
- Apr 22, 2026Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 21, 2026Complaint2 findings
- Jul 31, 2025Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Jun 10, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Feb 26, 2025Standard7 findings
- Jan 9, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Oct 28, 2024Complaint2 findings
Show the 19 earlier surveys
- May 29, 2024Complaint5 findings
- Apr 23, 2024Complaint3 findings
- Feb 28, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Dec 13, 2023Standard10 findings
- Oct 27, 2022Standard2 findings
- Aug 5, 2021Complaint2 findings
- Sep 30, 2019Standard5 findings
- Feb 28, 2019Complaint3 findings
- Jun 5, 2018Standard and complaint4 findings · 1 harm
- Feb 26, 2018Complaint5 findings · 1 harm
- May 19, 2016Complaint5 findings · 1 harm
- Dec 16, 2015Standard and complaint8 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 2, 2014Standard and complaint5 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 5, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Jul 11, 2013—9 findings
- Apr 22, 2013—1 finding
- Nov 7, 2012—1 finding
- Apr 11, 2012—3 findings
- Oct 20, 2010—2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction