Deficiency Index

Laurels of Blanchester, The

Blanchester, Ohio · CCN 365552

9 surveys since 2012, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
51
Surveys
9
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2012–2023
’12’15’20’23
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file7/9

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
50
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
CIENA HEALTHCARE/LAUREL HEALTH CARE
County
Clinton · rural
Medicare-certified since
1981

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
2
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=10, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Apr 18, 2022

1,666 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.413.57
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.44—
Annual nurse turnover39.6%46.9%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1482.4%E317.6%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 17 of the 51 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6572×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

  • F5781×

    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.

  • F6231×

    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.

  • F6371×

    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition

  • F6401×

    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Laurels of Blanchester, The, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF657Apr 18, 2022

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were invited to participate in their care plan. This affected four (#14, #38, #37 and #41) residents out of five residents reviewed for participation in care planning. The facility census was 49. Findings include: 1. Review of the Resident #14's chart revealed Resident #14 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Review of Resident #14's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident to be severely cognitively impaired and Resident #14 required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene. Resident #14 was also independent with eating. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF756Apr 18, 2022

    Based on medical record review, review of facility policy, and interview the facility failed to implement pharmacy recommendations in a timely manner and provide documentation for completed monthly medication reviews. The affected five of five Residents (#11, #18, #19, #10, and #21) reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 49. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #11 revealed admitted [DATE]. Diagnoses included muscle weakness, need for personal assistance, dysphagia, oral phase, [CONDITION(S)], [CONDITION(S)], anxiety, gastro-[CONDITION(S)] reflux disease (GERD), constipation, and cognitive communication deficit. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF580May 30, 2023

    Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to notify resident representatives about significant changes in medication. This affected one (Resident #22) of three residents reviewed for notifications. The facility census was 39. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admitted [DATE]. Diagnoses included hypertensive heart disease without heart failure, dementia, and unspecified psychosis. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition, had no behaviors, did not reject care, and did not wander. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF637Apr 18, 2022

    Based on record review ,staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was completed within 14 days of a resident's admission to hospice services. This affected one (#14) resident out of one resident reviewed for hospice services. The facility census was 49. Findings include: Review of the Resident #14's chart revealed Resident #14 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Review of Resident #14's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident to be severely cognitively impaired and Resident #14 required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF640Apr 18, 2022

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete and transmit a resident's discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS). This affected one (Resident #02) out of 14 residents reviewed for assessments. The facility census was 49. Findings include: Review of the Resident #02's chart revealed Resident #02 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Resident #02 discharged from the facility on 12/19/21. Review of Resident #02's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident to be severe cognitively impaired and Resident #02 required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene. Resident #02 also required supervision with eating on the MDS. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 51 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • May 30, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 18, 2022Standard9 findings
  • Jul 11, 2019Standard8 findings
  • May 31, 2018Standard10 findings
  • Mar 23, 2017Standard5 findings
  • Sep 18, 2014Standard and complaint3 findings
  • Mar 12, 2014Complaint3 findings
  • Jun 14, 2013—8 findings
Show the 1 earlier survey
  • Mar 16, 2012—4 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction