Deficiency Index

The Springs at Wyandot Trail

Lancaster, Ohio · CCN 725000

1 survey since 2026, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
9
Surveys
1
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2026–2026
’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Citations on record9

Across 1 surveys carrying at least one finding.

The facility

Certified beds
52
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES
County
Fairfield
Medicare-certified since
2024

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
4
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=9, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Apr 16, 2026

207 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.513.57
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.98—

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD888.9%E111.1%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 9 of the 9 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at The Springs at Wyandot Trail, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF583Apr 16, 2026

    Based on observations and interview with staff, the facility failed to ensure that the facility's electronic charting system was secure during medication administration. This affected 12 residents residing in the 300 hall (Resident #24, #26, #34, #20, #23, #41, #9, #40, #17, #44, #19, and #27) of 12 residents reviewed for privacy. The facility census was 44. Findings include:On 04/13/2026 at 9:47 A.M., during morning medication pass in 300 hall, Registered Nurse (RN) #228 was observed walking away from the medication cart. The laptop located on the medication cart remained open, and the facility's electronic charting system was visible and accessible to anyone in the immediate area. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF677Apr 16, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to provide assistance with completing activities of daily living, which included shaving. This affected one (Resident #55) of two residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 44 residents.Findings include:Resident #55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included atrial fibrillation, diabetes mellitus, traumatic brain injury, lymphedema, and sleep apnea.Review of the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) Evaluation dated 04/10/26 revealed the resident was cognitively intact. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF685Apr 16, 2026

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to address a resident's hearing aids going missing and put through laundry. This affected one (Resident #3) of one resident reviewed for hearing. The facility census was 44. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an admission date of 12/17/2025. Diagnosis included stage 2 chronic kidney disease, neoplasm of the colon, and depression. Review of the plan of care dated 12/17/25 revealed Resident #3 demonstrates hearing loss. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF686Apr 16, 2026

    Based on medical record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to accurately assess pressure ulcers for Resident #9. This affected one resident (#9) of the three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 44.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 12/21/24 with diagnoses of but not limited to functional quadriplegia, unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition, lymphedema, pressure ulcer of right hip, and non-pressure ulcer of other part of right foot limited to breakdown of skin. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated no cognitive impairment. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF689Apr 16, 2026

    Based on interview, medical record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to use a Hoyer lift (a mechanical device used to transfer individuals with limited mobility) during a resident transfer as per care plan resulting in a fall without injury. This affected one (Resident #15) of five residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 44 residents.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included repeated falls, need for assistance with personal care, and muscle weakness (generalized).Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #15 was cognitively intact, required substantial or maximal assistance for shower/bathe self, and was dependent for sit to… […]

Read all 9 findings in full →

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Apr 16, 2026Standard and complaint9 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction