Deficiency Index

Lakeview House SKLD NRSG and Residential Care Fac

Haverhill, Massachusetts · CCN 225401

13 surveys since 2013, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
29
Surveys
13
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2013–2026
’13’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file10/13

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
91
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Essex
Medicare-certified since
1990

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
4
Staffing
4
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 49 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Massachusetts.

Last survey on record

Jul 30, 2025

467 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.193.58
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.52—
Annual nurse turnover20.8%39.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1191.7%E—F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B18.3%C—
CMS’s current file: 12 of the 29 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5802×

    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

  • F6572×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

  • F6041×

    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.

  • F6371×

    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition

  • F6561×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Lakeview House SKLD NRSG and Residential Care Fac, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Jun 30, 2026

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that resident food and drinks were dated, that food was not stored under a sink next to possible sources of contamination, that food requiring refrigeration was refrigerated, and that food was covered in one of one unit kitchenettes. Findings include:Review of the undated facility's policy titled Food Safety Requirements Policy, indicated, but was not limited to, the following:-The policy of Lakeview House Skilled Nursing and Residential Care facility is to provide safe and sanitary storage, handling and consumption of all food including food and fluids brought to residents by family and visitors.-The… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Jul 13, 2022

    Based on observation, record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to adhere to infection control practices to prevent possible transmission of infectious disease when 1. the facility failed to implement transmission-based precautions for one of one Residents (#3) with a multi drug resistant organism ([CONDITION(S)]) infection, out of a total sample of 12 residents and, 2. the facility failed to ensure reusable medical equipment was disinfected in between resident use. Findings include: 1 For Resident #3, the facility failed to implement transmission-based precautions after being diagnosed positive for Extended Spectrum Beta Lactamase (ESBL), a multi drug resistant organism ([CONDITION(S)]) infection. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF698Jun 30, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services consistent with professional standards of practice for one Resident (#7), of one applicable resident receiving dialysis (process that filters wastes, salts and fluid from your blood when the kidneys are unable to work adequately) services, out of a total sample of 12 residents.Specifically, for Resident #7, the facility failed to accurately monitor the total daily fluid intake, placing him/her at risk for complications related to fluid overload.Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled, Dialysis, undated, indicated:-The facility shall provide adequate management of Dialysis services to ensure that residents attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF580Jul 30, 2025

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician of a significant change in status for one Resident (#2) out of a total sample of 14 residents. Specifically, after the worsening of a pressure wound on the sacrum of Resident #2. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Wound Care Protocol, undated, indicated the following: If a resident is found to have a wound/pressure area present at the time of amission, the following steps will be followed: Notification of the PCP (primary care physician) for treatment and/or evaluation/consult orders. Notification of Director/Assistant of Nurses.Orders for treatment will be addressed immediately. Assessments will be performed on an ongoing basis to ensure optimal healing. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF657Jul 30, 2025

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to review and revise the care plan by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments for 2 Residents (#7 and #21) out of a total sample of 14 residents. Specifically:For resident #7 the facility failed to review and/or revise the care plan after the completion of a quarterly MDS dated [DATE].For Resident #21 the facility failed to review and/or revise the care plan after the completion of a comprehensive MDS dated [DATE]. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Care Plan Process, not dated, indicated care plans can be updated and revised when necessary and again quarterly. 1. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 29 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 30, 2026Standard2 findings
  • Jul 30, 2025Standard4 findings
  • Aug 7, 2024Standard3 findings
  • Jul 13, 2023Standard5 findings
  • Aug 22, 2022Infection control1 finding
  • Jul 13, 2022Standard5 findings
  • Oct 7, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Sep 16, 2020Infection control1 finding
Show the 5 earlier surveys
  • Jun 14, 2019Standard2 findings
  • Jun 28, 2018Standard1 finding
  • Apr 12, 2017Standard2 findings
  • Jun 2, 2016Standard1 finding
  • Apr 9, 2013—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction