Deficiency Index

Timberlyn Heights Nursing and Rehabilitation

Great Barrington, Massachusetts · CCN 225495

15 surveys since 2011, 7 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
62
Surveys
15
Harm or worse
7
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2024
’11’15’20’24
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse7

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file13/15

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
71
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
Independent
County
Berkshire
Medicare-certified since
1990

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
5
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=17, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Sep 11, 2024

789 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.103.58
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.84—
Annual nurse turnover30.2%39.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG116.7%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD583.3%E—F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 6 of the 62 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Timberlyn Heights Nursing and Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF561Sep 15, 2023

    Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), whose Advanced Directives and Physician's Orders indicated his/her elected code status was Do Not Resuscitate (DNR, medical order written by a physician, which instructs healthcare providers not to do cardiopulmonary resuscitation, in the event of cardiac or respiratory arrest) and Do Not Intubate (DNI, medical order written by a physician, which instructs healthcare providers not to place a tube down the patient's throat or connect to a breathing machine that pumps air into and out of lungs), the Facility failed to ensure nursing staff honored his/her right to self-determination related to his/her choice of Advanced Directives. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF656Sep 15, 2023

    Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) whose Comprehensive Person Centered Plan of Care indicated he/she was Do Not Resuscitate (DNR, medical order written by a physician, which instructs healthcare providers not to do cardiopulmonary resuscitation, in the event of cardiac or respiratory arrest) and Do Not Intubate (DNI, medical order written by a physician, which instructs healthcare providers not to place a tube down the patient's throat or connect to a breathing machine that pumps air into and out of lungs) and that staff were to honor his/her wishes, the Facility failed to ensure nursing implemented and followed interventions identified in Resident #1's plan of care related to his/her Advanced Directives. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF658Sep 15, 2023

    Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), whose Advanced Directives and Physician's Order indicated his/her elected code status was Do Not Resuscitate (DNR, medical order written by a physician, which instructs healthcare providers not to do cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), in the event of cardiac or respiratory arrest) and Do Not Intubate (DNI, medical order written by a physician, which instructs healthcare providers not to place a tube down the patient's throat or connect to a breathing machine that pumps air into and out of lungs), the Facility failed to ensure services provided by nursing met professional standards of practice, when nursing initiated life saving measures including performing chest compressions on a resident who was… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF755Aug 10, 2021

    Based on policy review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure an opened Insulin Emergency Kit (E-Kit) was replaced on one of two units observed. Findings include: Review of the facility Emergency Pharmacy Service and Emergency Kits Policy, dated 9/1/13, included: -The nurse records the medication use from the emergency kit on the medication order/use form and calls the pharmacy for replacement of the kit/dose or flags the kit with a color-coded lock to indicate their need for replacement of kit/dose as soon as possible after the medication has been administered. -If exchanging kits, opened kits are replaced with sealed kits within 72 hours of opening. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Aug 10, 2021

    Based on policy review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to A.) Label and/or date food items used for resident meal service, and B.) Failed to ensure food preparation equipment was clean and free of debris. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Dietary Services, dated [DATE], indicated: -Foods will be properly labeled with name of product and date of production. -Foods will be date marked with the name of the product and the date of the production or opening . […]

Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 62 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Sep 11, 2024Standard2 findings
  • Sep 15, 2023Complaint4 findings · 3 harm
  • Aug 10, 2021Standard11 findings
  • Mar 26, 2019Standard8 findings
  • Nov 16, 2017Standard2 findings
  • Oct 23, 2017Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 21, 2017Complaint4 findings
  • Aug 15, 2016Standard5 findings
Show the 7 earlier surveys
  • Feb 9, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • May 12, 2015Standard8 findings
  • Apr 28, 2014Standard2 findings
  • Apr 4, 2013—5 findings
  • Aug 29, 2012—1 finding
  • Feb 13, 2012—3 findings · 2 harm
  • Mar 28, 2011—4 findings · 1 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction