Deficiency Index

Lake Pointe Rehabilitation and Nursing Center

Conneaut, Ohio · CCN 365441

38 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2015.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
172
Surveys
38
Harm or worse
8
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file32/38

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
74
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
AOM HEALTHCARE
County
Ashtabula
Medicare-certified since
1980

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
3
Staffing
1
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 391 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Ohio.

Last survey on record

Jan 6, 2026

307 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day2.953.47
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.39—
Annual nurse turnover63.2%49.2%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1344.8%E931.0%F724.1%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 29 of the 172 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5502×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F6892×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F8012×

    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.

  • F8032×

    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.

  • F8422×

    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Lake Pointe Rehabilitation and Nursing Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF801Jan 6, 2026

    Based on interviews, and review of the dietitian contract, the dietetic technician's personnel file, and emails, the facility failed to ensure dietitian oversight of a dietetic technician's competency. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 61.Findings include:Review of the contract between the facility and Consultant Registered Dietitian (CRD) #249 dated 08/01/25 revealed the said dietitian provided the facility with medical nutrition therapy for its residents to include but not limited to nutrition assessments based on the minimum data set (MDS) schedule, and assessments of residents experiencing significant weight changes, compromised skin integrity (pressure ulcers specifically), or has a high risk with receiving specialized… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF842Jan 6, 2026

    Based on observation, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain resident medical records in a secure environment that safeguarded it from unauthorized use and prevented loss or destruction. This affected an unidentified number of discharged residents. The facility census was 61.Findings include:Interview on 12/30/25 at 12:30 P.M. with Director of Nursing (DON) regarding storage of resident medical records revealed storage of any current residents' records were kept in the locked business office area for confidentiality but stated being unsure of where discharged residents' records were kept.Observation on 12/30/25 at 12:55 P.M. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Jun 18, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to maintain enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) and transmission-based precautions (TBP) appropriately as required. This affected nine residents (#2, #4, #12, #15, #21, #24, #39, #49 and #55) and had the potential to affect all 56 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Observation on 06/17/24 at 8:20 A.M. during a facility tour revealed the following: An EBP sign was posted at the entrance of Resident #2's room. There was a storage bin to the left of the entrance door which held personal protective equipment (PPE). […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF814Nov 8, 2023

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure the garbage/dumpster area was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all 58 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Observation of the facility dumpster area with Dietary Manager (DM) #461 on 11/06/23 at 10:28 A.M. revealed a door of the dumpster was open. A mattress, chair, and two wood pallets were stacked beside the dumpster. DM #461 verified the findings at the time of the observation.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF606Jul 13, 2023

    Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure Dietary Employee (DE) #203, who was a registered tier three sex offender was not employed in a position that included direct resident contact. This had the potential to affect all 61 residents residing in the facility. Findings included: Record review of Dietary Employee (DE) #203's personnel file revealed the employee was hired as a cook through the facility dietary services contract company who assigned him to work in the dietary department at the facility. DE #203's first date of employment with the facility was 10/05/22. […]

Read 28 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 28 of 172 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jan 6, 2026Standard and complaint6 findings
  • Nov 7, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 18, 2024Complaint7 findings
  • Nov 8, 2023Standard and complaint3 findings
  • Jul 13, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 11, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 3, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 28, 2021Standard and complaint11 findings
Show the 30 earlier surveys
  • Mar 24, 2021Complaint4 findings
  • Jan 16, 2020Complaint5 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 10, 2019Complaint4 findings
  • Jul 23, 2019Complaint3 findings
  • Mar 14, 2019Standard9 findings · 2 harm
  • Dec 4, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 4, 2018Complaint5 findings
  • Feb 1, 2018Standard4 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 21, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • May 25, 2017Standard and complaint5 findings
  • Mar 20, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 9, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 8, 2016Standard3 findings
  • Sep 14, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 14, 2016Standard and complaint7 findings
  • Mar 14, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 23, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 17, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 15, 2015Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 20, 2015Standard21 findings · 3 harm
  • Apr 7, 2015Complaint6 findings
  • Sep 17, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 3, 2014Standard3 findings
  • Aug 18, 2013—2 findings
  • Jun 22, 2013—1 finding
  • Jan 28, 2013—8 findings
  • Feb 1, 2012—3 findings
  • Dec 28, 2011—6 findings
  • Sep 30, 2011Standard and complaint21 findings
  • Mar 8, 2011—3 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction