Deficiency Index

Holt Senior Care and Rehab Center

Holt, Michigan · CCN 235279

23 surveys since 2011, 9 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
112
Surveys
23
Harm or worse
9
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file19/23

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
101
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
NEXCARE HEALTH SYSTEMS
County
Ingham
Medicare-certified since
1976

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
4
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 89 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Michigan.

Last survey on record

Apr 9, 2026

214 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.903.66
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.73—
Annual nurse turnover21.8%47.2%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG16.3%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1487.5%E16.3%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 16 of the 112 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6412×

    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

  • F6371×

    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition

  • F6401×

    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.

  • F6451×

    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities

  • F6561×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Holt Senior Care and Rehab Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Apr 9, 2026

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement care planned interventions to prevent falls in 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #69) assessed for falls, resulting in repeated falls during staff assisted transfers and the potential for continued falls and/or serious injury. Findings include:Review of the Face Sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) with Assessment Reference Date of 1/22/26, reflected R69 was a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction with hemiparesis affecting left non-dominant side(left side paralyzed , vascular dementia, left above the knee amputation, atrial fibrillation(heart arrythmia with use of blood thinners), cognitive communication deficit, and major depressive disorder… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Jan 15, 2025

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) was utilized for contact precaution and ensure hand hygiene was performed for four (Resident #22, 26, 52, and 57) of reviewed for contact precautions. Findings include: On 1/13/25 at 10:34 AM, a contact precaution sign was observed outside of the room of Resident #22 (R22) and Resident #57 (R57). The contact precaution sign indicated that hand washing prior to entry of the room, as well as donning a gown and gloves (PPE) was necessary prior to entering the room. On 1/13/25 at 10:37 AM, a contact precaution sign was observed outside of the room of Resident #26 (R26) and Resident #52 (R52). […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF689Sep 23, 2022

    This citation includes intake MI 8592. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to: 1.) ensure the safety, 2.) implement care-planned and non-care-planned interventions, and 3.) ensure that those interventions were functional and in place in 4 of 6 sampled residents (R19, R28, R30, and R37) reviewed for falls, resulting in repeat falls and R28 unwitnessed fall from elevated bed resulting in left lower leg fracture, deep tissue injury, decline and later death. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Sep 23, 2022

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention, monitoring and control program while residents are in quarantine with Covid, resulting the potential for the spread of microorganisms when staff did not wear personal protective equipment while assisting residents. Staff did not perform hand hygiene before or after care, did not change out gowns, mask or clean goggles before leaving the residents room, resulting in the potential for the spread of infections to (R35, R39, R49, R56, R224) and up to 71 residents who resided at the facility. During observation on 09/23/22 at 08:50 AM, Staff were observed entering and exiting the residents' rooms on quarantine without wiping goggles off or changing out mask. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF641Apr 9, 2026

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate coding of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for one (R80) of 19 reviewed.Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected R80 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE], with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease and dependence on renal dialysis. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/3/25, reflected R80 received dialysis. The Quarterly MDS, with an ARD of 1/27/26, reflected R80 was not coded as receiving dialysis. On 04/09/2026 at 11:40 AM, R80 was observed lying in bed. A Physician's Order, with a revision date of 4/16/25, reflected R80's scheduled dialysis days were Monday, Wednesday, Friday and as needed. […]

Read 28 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 28 of 112 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Apr 9, 2026Standard6 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 15, 2025Standard5 findings
  • Aug 22, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 20, 2023Standard4 findings
  • Sep 23, 2022Standard and complaint10 findings
  • Jun 22, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 16, 2021Standard1 finding
  • Sep 11, 2019Standard4 findings
Show the 15 earlier surveys
  • Dec 7, 2018Standard5 findings
  • Feb 1, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 23, 2017Standard5 findings
  • Mar 16, 2017Complaint3 findings
  • Jul 14, 2016Standard11 findings · 1 harm
  • Jun 26, 2015Standard9 findings
  • Aug 11, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 13, 2014Standard7 findings
  • May 13, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 3, 2013Complaint6 findings · 6 harm
  • Jul 12, 2013—9 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 10, 2012—14 findings
  • Sep 23, 2011—6 findings
  • Apr 21, 2011—1 finding
  • Feb 18, 2011—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction