WellBridge of Romeo
Romeo, Michigan · CCN 235704
15 surveys since 2015, 7 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 41
- Surveys
- 15
- Harm or worse
- 7
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 124
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- THE WELLBRIDGE GROUP
- County
- Macomb
- Medicare-certified since
- 2015
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 5
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=16, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Dec 17, 2025
327 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.87 | 3.66 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.73 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 38.3% | 47.2% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1090.9% | E— | F19.1% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at WellBridge of Romeo, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Jun 15, 2022
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess/identify pressure injuries and consistently utilize preventative measure prevent the development and/or worsening of pressure ulcers for three (R88, R82 and R85) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, resulting in R88 having a misidentified Unstageable (full-thickness skin and tissue loss .obscured by eschar - devitalized tissue . usually black . may appear scab-like) sacrum pressure ulcer. Findings include: R88 On 6/13/22 at 9:47 AM, R88 was observed lying in bed. Protective foam boots were noted on the floor next to the dresser. R88 was asked if he had any wounds or sores. R88 explained he had wounds on his bottom and both his feet. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Jun 15, 2022
This citation pertains to intake #MI 096. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement appropriate interventions to prevent falls, injury from falls, and perform an accurate, thorough root cause analysis and investigation after a fall for one resident (R390), of three residents reviewed for falls, resulting in a fall with major injury. Findings include: Review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency on 6/13/22 revealed, .that complainant states the resident (R390) fell so hard that he sustained a bad cut on his head and had a brain bleed . […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF577Dec 17, 2025
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide access to past survey results, affecting 117 residents residing in the facility.Findings include: On 12/15/25 at 9:45 AM, during a tour of the facility, a table was noted with a sign on it saying, previous state survey results book can be found at this location. At 2:00 pm and 3:30 PM there was no book observed on the table. On 12/16/25 at 9:00 AM, 12:00 PM and 3:00 PM, there was no book observed on the table. On 12/17/25 at 9:00 am and 10:00 AM, there was no survey book available on table. On 12/17/25 at 10:05 AM, R9 was observed sitting up in wheelchair watching television. R9 was asked about the survey book and where it was located. R9 could not recall seeing a survey book or knowing where it was located. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Jun 15, 2022
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control standards and practices were consistently followed throughout the facility for seven of seven residents (R3, R10, R13, R14, R31, R63, and R77) reviewed for transmission-based precautions related to suspected COVID-19 exposure. Findings include: According to the facility's Pandemic Response Plan updated 3/9/22: .Manage Residents with Suspected or Confirmed [CONDITION(S)]-CoV-2 Infection - HCP (Health Care Personnel) caring for residents with suspected or confirmed [CONDITION(S)]-CoV-2 infection should use full PPE (gowns, gloves, eye protection, and a NIOSH-approved N95 or equivalent or higher-level respirator) .Ideally, a resident with suspected [CONDITION(S)]-CoV-2 infection should be moved… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF684Dec 17, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to apply heel boots per physician's order for one resident (R61) out of two reviewed for skin conditions. Findings include:On 12/17/2025 at 9:11 AM, R61 was observed in bed with socks on their feet and their heels resting on the bed.A review of the medical record revealed R61 admitted into the facility on 6/8/2024 with the following medical diagnoses, Encephalopathy and Pain in Right Hip. A review of the most recent Minimum Data Set assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 3/15 indicating an impaired cognition. R61 also required staff assistance with bed mobility and transfers.A review of the physician orders revealed the following, Bilateral heel lift boots on while in bed every shift. […]
Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 41 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Dec 17, 2025Standard2 findings
- Oct 10, 2024Standard and complaint3 findings
- Mar 20, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Aug 16, 2023Standard6 findings
- Jun 15, 2022Standard and complaint4 findings · 2 harm
- Oct 23, 2019Standard3 findings
- Aug 14, 2019Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Dec 28, 2018Complaint1 finding
Show the 7 earlier surveys
- Nov 16, 2018Standard2 findings
- Jan 25, 2018Standard3 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 17, 2017Complaint2 findings
- Mar 1, 2017Standard and complaint7 findings · 2 harm
- Mar 17, 2016Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Feb 10, 2016Standard4 findings
- Jan 29, 2015Standard1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction