Deficiency Index

WellBridge of Romeo

Romeo, Michigan · CCN 235704

15 surveys since 2015, 7 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
41
Surveys
15
Harm or worse
7
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2015–2025
’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse7

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file11/15

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
124
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
THE WELLBRIDGE GROUP
County
Macomb
Medicare-certified since
2015

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
4
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=16, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Dec 17, 2025

327 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.873.66
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.73—
Annual nurse turnover38.3%47.2%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1090.9%E—F19.1%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 11 of the 41 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at WellBridge of Romeo, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Jun 15, 2022

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess/identify pressure injuries and consistently utilize preventative measure prevent the development and/or worsening of pressure ulcers for three (R88, R82 and R85) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, resulting in R88 having a misidentified Unstageable (full-thickness skin and tissue loss .obscured by eschar - devitalized tissue . usually black . may appear scab-like) sacrum pressure ulcer. Findings include: R88 On 6/13/22 at 9:47 AM, R88 was observed lying in bed. Protective foam boots were noted on the floor next to the dresser. R88 was asked if he had any wounds or sores. R88 explained he had wounds on his bottom and both his feet. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Jun 15, 2022

    This citation pertains to intake #MI 096. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement appropriate interventions to prevent falls, injury from falls, and perform an accurate, thorough root cause analysis and investigation after a fall for one resident (R390), of three residents reviewed for falls, resulting in a fall with major injury. Findings include: Review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency on 6/13/22 revealed, .that complainant states the resident (R390) fell so hard that he sustained a bad cut on his head and had a brain bleed . […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF577Dec 17, 2025

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide access to past survey results, affecting 117 residents residing in the facility.Findings include: On 12/15/25 at 9:45 AM, during a tour of the facility, a table was noted with a sign on it saying, previous state survey results book can be found at this location. At 2:00 pm and 3:30 PM there was no book observed on the table. On 12/16/25 at 9:00 AM, 12:00 PM and 3:00 PM, there was no book observed on the table. On 12/17/25 at 9:00 am and 10:00 AM, there was no survey book available on table. On 12/17/25 at 10:05 AM, R9 was observed sitting up in wheelchair watching television. R9 was asked about the survey book and where it was located. R9 could not recall seeing a survey book or knowing where it was located. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Jun 15, 2022

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control standards and practices were consistently followed throughout the facility for seven of seven residents (R3, R10, R13, R14, R31, R63, and R77) reviewed for transmission-based precautions related to suspected COVID-19 exposure. Findings include: According to the facility's Pandemic Response Plan updated 3/9/22: .Manage Residents with Suspected or Confirmed [CONDITION(S)]-CoV-2 Infection - HCP (Health Care Personnel) caring for residents with suspected or confirmed [CONDITION(S)]-CoV-2 infection should use full PPE (gowns, gloves, eye protection, and a NIOSH-approved N95 or equivalent or higher-level respirator) .Ideally, a resident with suspected [CONDITION(S)]-CoV-2 infection should be moved… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF684Dec 17, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to apply heel boots per physician's order for one resident (R61) out of two reviewed for skin conditions. Findings include:On 12/17/2025 at 9:11 AM, R61 was observed in bed with socks on their feet and their heels resting on the bed.A review of the medical record revealed R61 admitted into the facility on 6/8/2024 with the following medical diagnoses, Encephalopathy and Pain in Right Hip. A review of the most recent Minimum Data Set assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 3/15 indicating an impaired cognition. R61 also required staff assistance with bed mobility and transfers.A review of the physician orders revealed the following, Bilateral heel lift boots on while in bed every shift. […]

Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 41 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Dec 17, 2025Standard2 findings
  • Oct 10, 2024Standard and complaint3 findings
  • Mar 20, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 16, 2023Standard6 findings
  • Jun 15, 2022Standard and complaint4 findings · 2 harm
  • Oct 23, 2019Standard3 findings
  • Aug 14, 2019Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Dec 28, 2018Complaint1 finding
Show the 7 earlier surveys
  • Nov 16, 2018Standard2 findings
  • Jan 25, 2018Standard3 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 17, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 1, 2017Standard and complaint7 findings · 2 harm
  • Mar 17, 2016Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Feb 10, 2016Standard4 findings
  • Jan 29, 2015Standard1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction