Deficiency Index

Holly Hall

Houston, Texas · CCN 676306

18 surveys since 2012, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
58
Surveys
18
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2012–2025
’12’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file13/18

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
62
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
Independent
County
Harris
Medicare-certified since
2012

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
3
Staffing
4
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 75 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Texas.

Last survey on record

Oct 7, 2025

398 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.743.40
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.56—
Annual nurse turnover58.7%50.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1041.7%E1354.2%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B14.2%C—
CMS’s current file: 24 of the 58 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6773×

    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

  • F8122×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F5501×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F5521×

    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.

  • F5841×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Holly Hall, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Apr 28, 2022

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food service safety in that: The facility failed to ensure: -the kitchen floors were kept clean and free of food particles. -the cooking grease in the deep fryer was kept clean. - the can opener clean and free of food debris. -left over food items were properly labeled and dated. -expired foods were discarded. -the vent hood was free of grease build up. These failures could place residents at risk for food-borne illness and cross contamination. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF550Oct 7, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality for 1 (Resident #37) of 4 residents and 3 of 3 confidential group residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to provide showers to Resident #37 and 3 of 3 confidential group residents. This failure could affect the residents who require assistance with their ADLs from facility staff by placing them at risk for social isolation, loss of dignity, and self-worth. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF677Oct 7, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for 1 of 1 (Resident #37) and 3 of 5 confidential residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility did not consistently provide Resident #37 and 3 of 5 confidential residents bed baths/showers on their scheduled shower days in the month of September 2025. This failure could place residents at risk of skin breakdown and reduced feelings of self-worth. Findings included: Resident #37:Record review of Resident #37's Face sheet dated 10/01/2025 indicated he was an [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF690Oct 7, 2025

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #9 ) reviewed for quality of care. 1. The facility failed to assess, follow-up with treatment, update the care-plan, obtain new order due to a change in resident #9's skin condition of the groin and resident's report of pain, at which time the penis split measured 1. 8 cm length by 0.5 cm width and appeared red and raw, which was first identified on 9/22/25 and failed to ensure that Resident #9's indwelling catheter (drains urine from your bladder into a bag outside your body) had a securement device to anchor catheter.2. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF692Oct 7, 2025

    Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident had acceptable parameters of nutritional status such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range for discharged (DC #1) Resident and 8 of 8 residents reviewed for weight loss. 1. The facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range for 1 of 1 discharged resident (DC) #1 and 8 of 8 (Resident #7, Resident #9, Resident #10, Resident #16, Resident #23, Resident #29, Resident #37 and Resident #42) residents, reviewed for weight loss. 2. The facility failed to ensure 3 of 3 scales used for weight were calibrated accurately. 3. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 58 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Oct 7, 2025Standard13 findings
  • Oct 3, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 29, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 3, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 8, 2023Standard and complaint7 findings
  • Apr 28, 2022Standard and complaint7 findings
  • Mar 10, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 30, 2020Infection control1 finding
Show the 10 earlier surveys
  • Jul 31, 2019Standard4 findings
  • Nov 3, 2016Standard5 findings
  • Feb 11, 2016Standard1 finding
  • Apr 9, 2015Standard6 findings
  • Oct 8, 2014Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 25, 2014Standard2 findings
  • Feb 2, 2014—1 finding
  • Apr 4, 2013—2 findings
  • Jun 22, 2012—1 finding
  • Feb 2, 2012—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction