Deficiency Index

Crosbyton Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

Crosbyton, Texas · CCN 675291

23 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
122
Surveys
23
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file18/23

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
53
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
SKYBLUE HEALTHCARE
County
Crosby
Medicare-certified since
1994

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
3
Staffing
4
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 75 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Texas.

Last survey on record

Dec 2, 2025

342 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.093.40
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.37—
Annual nurse turnover42.3%50.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1651.6%E1238.7%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B39.7%C—
CMS’s current file: 31 of the 122 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8123×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F9123×

    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F8032×

    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.

  • F8802×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Crosbyton Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF565Dec 2, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a resident or family group with private space for the residents' monthly council meetings and the confidential resident group meeting during survey (09/24/2025) for eight of eight confidential residents reviewed for resident council. The facility did not provide private space for resident council meetings. This failure could place residents at risk of not being able to exercise their rights of being able to voice their grievances in private, without uninvited staff being present.Findings Included:Observation and interviews on 09/24/2025 at 2:00 PM in a Resident Council meeting, conducted during survey, revealed the following: The Resident Council meeting was held in the activities room. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Dec 2, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for dietary services, in that: The facility failed on 09/23/25 to seal food stored in pantry. These failures could place residents at risk for food contamination and foodborne illness.The findings included: The following observation was made on 09/23/25 at 09:40 AM during the initial tour of the kitchen:Bag of brownie mix in plastic bag not sealed.Bag of Pasta in original bag with large hole in bag in a plastic container not covered or sealed. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF921Dec 2, 2025

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public, for 1 of 1 facility roof. The facility failed to ensure the roof of the facility was in good repair. This failure could cause leaking and water damage and cause the facility to have an unsightly appearance. The findings included: On 09/23/25 at 9:30 AM, upon entrance to the facility, an observation was made of the roof of the facility. A large blue tarp was noted to cover a large portion of the roof. The areas of the roof that were uncovered by the blue tarp were noted to have shingles missing in places. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF607Feb 6, 2025

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse and neglect for 4 of 7 residents (Resident #1, #2, #3 and #4) reviewed for abuse. The ADM (Abuse Preventionist) failed to follow the facility's abuse policy by not reporting the allegation of abuse to HHSC and documenting his investigation regarding the Resident-to-Resident altercation (Between Resident #1 and Resident #2) that occurred and was reported on 1/08/25 by the DON and LVN A. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF609Feb 6, 2025

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours if the alleged violation involved abuse or neglect and resulted in bodily injury, to other officials (including the State Agency) and the Abuse Preventionist for 4 of 7 residents (Resident #1, #2, #3 and #4) reviewed for abuse. The ADM (Abuse Preventionist) failed to report the allegation of abuse to HHSC regarding the Resident-to-Resident altercation (Between Resident #1 and Resident #2) that occurred and was reported on 1/08/25 by the DON and LVN A within the appropriate time frame. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 122 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Dec 2, 2025Standard13 findings
  • Feb 6, 2025Complaint4 findings
  • Nov 6, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 31, 2024Standard6 findings
  • Jun 9, 2023Standard6 findings
  • Apr 10, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 12, 2022Infection control1 finding
  • May 17, 2022Standard2 findings
Show the 15 earlier surveys
  • Feb 26, 2020Standard3 findings
  • Dec 30, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 20, 2019Standard6 findings
  • Apr 12, 2018Standard7 findings
  • May 10, 2017Standard6 findings
  • Oct 18, 2016Complaint3 findings
  • Apr 27, 2016Standard11 findings
  • Jul 30, 2015Complaint3 findings
  • Mar 25, 2015Standard7 findings
  • Mar 6, 2014Standard and complaint12 findings
  • Sep 11, 2013—2 findings
  • Apr 3, 2013—11 findings
  • Feb 9, 2012—5 findings
  • Mar 24, 2011—7 findings
  • Feb 1, 2011—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction