Avir at Itasca
Itasca, Texas · CCN 675712
23 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2020.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 73
- Surveys
- 23
- Harm or worse
- 3
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 51
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- AVIR HEALTH GROUP
- County
- Hill · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1997
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 75 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Texas.
Last survey on record
Jul 30, 2026
102 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 2.97 | 3.40 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.52 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 40.0% | 50.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D853.3% | E533.3% | F16.7% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B16.7% | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F5832×
Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
- F5842×
Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
- F8122×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F9252×
Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
- F5801×
Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Avir at Itasca, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Sep 15, 2021
Based on observation, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents and hazards for one (Resident #1) of 11 residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility failed to provide adequate supervision and routine resident checks for Resident #1 on the secure unit. The facility failed to have sufficient staffing in secure unit to meet residents' needs. The facility failed to provide adequate supervision or monitoring of residents in secure unit to prevent elopement risk. On 09/09/2021 on or around 3:00 a.m., Resident #1 climbed out of a window of the secure unit dining area. Resident #1 got a ride from a male stranger and was located 30 miles away on or around 9:00 am on 09/09/2021. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Aug 24, 2023
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's only kitchen reviewed for food and kitchen safety. The facility failed to label and date food products io the refrigerator and thaw foods appropriately. There failures could place residents at risk for food-born illness. Findings included: Observations on 8-22-2023 at 8:30 AM of the facility's refrigerator revealed parmesan cheese and sliced American cheese loosely wrapped, exposed to the air, without labels to signify the date in which the product was opened and when it was supposed to expire. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jun 9, 2022
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food under sanitary conditions in 1 of 1 kitchen when they failed to: A. Ensure kitchen staff used proper hand washing and sanitation procedures when handling food. B. Ensure stored food was properly labeled and dated. These failures placed residents who ate food served by the kitchen at risk of cross contamination and food-borne illness. Findings include: An observation of the kitchen freezer on 6/7/22 at 9:05 a.m. revealed the following: 1. 4 bags of French fries, no label or date, and not in the original box. 2. 1 package of meat, no label or date, and not in the original box. 3. 1 package of fish, no label or date, and not in the original box. 4. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jan 24, 2022
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for one of one kitchen. The facility failed to ensure the water temperature of the dishwasher was checked daily and failed to verify the temperature met safety standards. The deficient practice placed residents who were served from the kitchen at risk for health complications and foodborne illnesses. Findings included: Observation on 1/24/22 at 1:28 PM, revealed kitchen staff checked the pH level of the automatic dishwasher and the result was within the correct range. The staff ran the dishwasher four (4) times and the temperature gage never went higher than 92 degrees. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF603Jul 30, 2026
Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure 3 of 7 residents, Resident 1, Resident #2, and Resident #3 reviewed for admission to the secured unit were free from involuntary seclusion.The facility failed to ensure Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3, had no physician's order for admission to the secured unit. The failures placed all residents on the secured unit at risk of not being assessed properly, not meeting the criteria to be placed on the unit, diminished quality of life and involuntary seclusion.Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, 07/30/2026, revealed a sixty-eight year old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included drug induced subacute dyskinesia (a movement disorder causing… […]
Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 73 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 30, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Jan 8, 2026Standard5 findings
- Nov 26, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Oct 10, 2024Standard4 findings
- Jul 18, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Aug 24, 2023Standard and complaint3 findings
- Jun 9, 2022Standard5 findings
- Mar 28, 2022Complaint1 finding
Show the 15 earlier surveys
- Jan 24, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Sep 15, 2021Infection control3 findings · 1 harm
- Nov 20, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Sep 15, 2020Infection control2 findings · 2 harm
- Jun 26, 2019Standard5 findings
- May 23, 2018Standard and complaint6 findings
- Apr 27, 2017Standard2 findings
- Mar 23, 2016Standard4 findings
- Apr 2, 2015Standard2 findings
- Mar 6, 2014Standard9 findings
- Jul 29, 2013—1 finding
- Apr 10, 2013—5 findings
- Mar 28, 2012—7 findings
- Jun 24, 2011—2 findings
- Apr 6, 2011—2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction