Deficiency Index

Hazel Hawkins Memorial Hospital D/P SNF

Hollister, California · CCN 055462

27 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2019.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
134
Surveys
27
Harm or worse
1
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse1

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file22/27

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
119
Ownership
Government - Hospital district
Chain
Independent
County
San Benito
Medicare-certified since
1968

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
3
Staffing
5
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 129 facilities of 100–127 beds in California.

Last survey on record

Sep 19, 2025

416 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.315.20
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.10—
Annual nurse turnover13.3%25.8%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1967.9%E828.6%F13.6%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 28 of the 134 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6412×

    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F7002×

    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.

  • F8042×

    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.

  • F8122×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Hazel Hawkins Memorial Hospital D/P SNF, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF700Mar 19, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper use of bed rails (side rails, safety rails, and grab/assist bars) for 86 of 88 sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 287, 387, 388, 389, and 390) when: 1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF656Sep 19, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement individualized, resident-centered care plans for 24 of 36 residents (Residents 84, 22, 28, 97, 98, 9, 60, 2, 5, 10, 50, 54, 58, 83, 91, 80, 34, 33, 41, 75, 64, 20, 66, and 6) who used bed rails or side rails (adjustable rigid bars attached to the side of a bed).These failures had the potential of unmet care needs for Residents 84, 22, 28, 97, 98, 9, 60, 2, 5, 10, 50, 54, 58, 83, 91, 80, 34, 33, 41, 75, 64, 20, 66, and 6's use of bed rails. Findings: 1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF804Sep 19, 2025

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared in a manner which conserved flavor and nutritive value when: 1. Lunch was ready at 9:30 a.m. and was held at hot temperature for hours prior to meal service.2. The correct texture and recipe were not followed for pureed diet. These deficient practices had the potential to result in loss of nutrients and to decrease the food intake of residents and could negatively impact their nutritional status. Findings: 1.During a kitchen observation of the North Side on 9/17/25 at 9:27 a.m. with Dietary Supervisor (DS) and Dietary [NAME] (DC), DC stated she finished preparing pureed food at 9:10 a.m. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Sep 19, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were implemented when:1. Registered nurse A (RN A) did not remove dirty gloves, perform hand hygiene (the act of cleaning hands with soap and water or an alcohol-based hand sanitizer to remove germs and prevent the spread of infections) and don (put on) a new pair of gloves before doing Resident 65's finger stick test (method of drawing drops of blood, most commonly used by people with high blood sugar to check their levels), and RN A did not perform hand hygiene after she picked the glove that fell on the floor and before putting on clean gloves prior to medication preparation;2. Registered nurse E (RN E) did not perform hand hygiene prior to medication administration;3. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF656Mar 19, 2024

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement, comprehensive, resident-centered, care plans for five out of twenty sampled residents, (Residents 51, 42, 47, 43 and 82), when the activity care plans of Residents 51, 42, 47, 43 and 82, were not comprehensive and resident-centered. These failures had the potential to result in the residents not receiving the interventions necessary to maintain their highest level of well-being. Findings: 1. […]

Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 134 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Sep 19, 2025Standard10 findings
  • Dec 12, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 19, 2024Standard and complaint10 findings
  • Oct 25, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 21, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 24, 2022Standard6 findings
  • May 10, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 25, 2022Complaint2 findings
Show the 19 earlier surveys
  • Aug 1, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 18, 2019Standard9 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 3, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 28, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 14, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 15, 2018Standard6 findings
  • Aug 24, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 23, 2017Standard5 findings
  • Dec 28, 2016Complaint3 findings
  • Apr 14, 2016Standard8 findings
  • May 14, 2015Standard5 findings
  • Mar 18, 2015Complaint4 findings
  • Jun 24, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 16, 2014Standard6 findings
  • Jul 29, 2013Standard16 findings
  • Mar 26, 2013—4 findings
  • Aug 17, 2012—13 findings
  • Jul 12, 2012—6 findings
  • Oct 13, 2011—10 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction