Oakdale Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
Oakdale, California · CCN 056155
17 surveys since 2010, 3 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 66
- Surveys
- 17
- Harm or worse
- 3
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 115
- Ownership
- Government - Hospital district
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Stanislaus
- Medicare-certified since
- 1971
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=16, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Mar 22, 2025
597 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.19 | 5.20 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.12 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 51.4% | 25.8% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1339.4% | E824.2% | F1133.3% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C13.0% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6562×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F6582×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
- F6772×
Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
- F7612×
Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
- F8122×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Oakdale Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF761Mar 22, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were securely stored when: 1.Registered Nurse (RN) 3, Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2, LVN 4, and RN 2 left the facility's medication cart unlocked when they walked away from during medication pass. This failure had the potential to place facility at risk for unauthorized access to medication cart and possible drug diversion. 2.Expired over the counter (OTC) medications were stored in medication cart and medication storage room; and eye drops was stored in medication cart beyond use date. This failure had the potential for residents to received expired medications that were no longer effective. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF801Mar 22, 2025
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dietetic staff had the appropriate skill sets to carry out the functions of food and nutrition services when: 1. The full-time Dietary Manger (DM) did not have the appropriate qualifications to meet the state requirements of the Health and Safety Code 1265.4 when Registered Dietitian (RD) 2 was only working onsite at the facility one day per week: and 2. RD 1 did not follow current standards of practice for nutrition-focused physical exams when she was a full-time consultant who worked remotely in another state and completed nutrition assessments for the facility. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Mar 22, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, and served safely in accordance with professional standards of food service safety for 91 out of 91 residents eating at the facility when: 1. An individually wrapped tuna sandwich was expired in the nourishment refrigerator. This failure had the potential to result in the serving of an expired tuna sandwich to 35 out of 35 residents eating regular textured diets at the facility which had the potential to lead to foodborne illness (illness caused by food contaminated with bacteria, viruses, parasites, or toxins). 2. A bottle of wine was not labeled and dated in the resident refrigerator. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF557Mar 22, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure four of four sampled residents (Resident 5, Resident 15, Resident 56, Resident 76) were treated with respect and dignity when: 1.Resident 15's foley catheter bag (a collection bag that attaches to a foley catheter, a type of indwelling catheter [a catheter left in place for a period of time], to collect urine drained from the bladder) had urine visible from the hallway and was not covered with a foley catheter decency bag. This failure resulted in violating Resident 15's right to privacy. 2.Resident 5, Resident 56, and Resident 76 were lined up in the hallway outside of the dining hall and not allowed to enter and eat until other residents were done eating. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF657Mar 22, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to review and revise a care plan (a detailed approach to care customized to an individual resident's needs) to reflect assessment and interventions for one of nine sampled residents (Resident 64) when Resident 64's care plans was not reviewed and revised by the Interdisciplinary team (IDT-group professional and direct care staff that development a plan of care for a resident) after re-admission (12/27/24). This failure resulted in Resident 64 being served the incorrect diet for her meals and had the potential to place Resident 64 at risk for unintended weight loss. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/18/25 at 10:48 a.m. […]
Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 66 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Mar 22, 2025Standard and complaint11 findings
- Apr 23, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Mar 21, 2024Standard2 findings
- Feb 15, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Sep 24, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Sep 3, 2019Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 28, 2019Standard19 findings
- Mar 13, 2019Complaint1 finding
Show the 9 earlier surveys
- Mar 16, 2018Standard1 finding
- Feb 8, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Jan 18, 2017Standard2 findings
- Nov 20, 2015Standard1 finding
- Sep 11, 2014Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Dec 5, 2013—6 findings · 1 harm
- Dec 13, 2012—3 findings
- Dec 5, 2011—4 findings
- Oct 15, 2010—8 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Masonic HomeUnion Cityno harm findings
- Alameda County Medical Center D/P SNFSan Leandro1 harm finding
- Lompoc Valley Medical Center Comprehensive Care CeLompocno harm findings
- Providence Little Co of Mary Transitional Care CTRTorranceno harm findings
- Hazel Hawkins Memorial Hospital D/P SNFHollisterno harm findings
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction