Greendale Forest Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
Snow Hill, North Carolina · CCN 345366
19 surveys since 2012. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2017.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 72
- Surveys
- 19
- Harm or worse
- 6
- Immediate jeopardy
- 4
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 115
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- PRINCIPLE LONG TERM CARE
- County
- Greene · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1991
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 125 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in North Carolina.
Last survey on record
Jun 18, 2026
144 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.33 | 3.47 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.29 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 29.9% | 49.8% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $18,132 across 2 penalties
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G25.6% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2055.6% | E719.4% | F12.8% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B38.3% | C38.3% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6843×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F8423×
Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
- F5842×
Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
- F7322×
Post nurse staffing information every day.
- F5501×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Greendale Forest Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Mar 27, 2025
Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to have effective systems in place for identifying the development of skin breakdown which delayed treatment and interventions. Resident #39's skin was intact on re-admission on 11/19/24. On 1/4/25 excoriation was noted on her buttocks. There were no further documented assessments until a wound assessment dated [DATE] recorded Resident #39 developed an unstageable (full thickness skin and tissue loss where the extent of tissue damage cannot be determined due to presence of slough, a yellow/white layer of dead skin tissue, or eschar, dry dead tissue, obscuring the wound bed) 5 centimeter (cm) by 5cm right buttocks pressure wound. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF600Apr 26, 2024
Based on observations, record review, staff and Physician interviews, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from injury of unknown source that resulted in bruising under the eyes and a fracture of the bridge of the nasal bones. This occurred for 1 of 1 cognitively impaired resident reviewed for an injury of unknown source. (Resident #1) Findings included. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including in part cerebral vascular accident (CVA), quadriplegia, and dementia. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had severely impaired cognition. She exhibited no physical or verbal behaviors directed toward others (e.g. hitting, kicking, grabbing, or yelling). […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF727Jun 18, 2026
Based on record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to schedule a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours per day seven days a week for 3 of 119 days (1/4/26, 2/8/26 and 3/15/26) reviewed for sufficient staffing.The findings included:A review of the daily posted nursing staff forms, daily nursing staff assignment sheets, and staff clock-in sheets from 1/1/26 through 3/31/26 and 5/18/26 through 6/18/26 was conducted.A review of the daily census posting sheets for 1/1/26 through 3/31/26 and 5/18/26 through 6/18/26 revealed no RN coverage for eight consecutive hours on 1/4/26, 2/8/26, and 3/15/26.On 6/18/26 at 9:53 AM the scheduler was interviewed. She could not recall the details of the dates of 1/4/26, 2/8/26, and 3/15/26 without any RN coverage. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF584Jun 18, 2026
Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide an environment free of wall damage (room [ROOM NUMBER], 707, and #710), failed to ensure pipes around hand washing sinks were sealed (room [ROOM NUMBER] and #307) and failed to provide privacy curtains free of stains (Rooms #408) for 6 of 26 rooms on 4 of 6 hallways reviewed for the environment. The findings included: 1A. An observation of room [ROOM NUMBER], which was occupied, took place on 6/15/26 at 11:58 AM and revealed deep scratch marks on the wall beside the residents bed, including a brownish-red dried substance in one of the marks and a large approximately 2 inch wide by 18 inch long by 1/2 deep gash in the sheetrock on the wall at the head of the bed. 1B. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF657Mar 27, 2025
Based on record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to conduct and document care plan meetings after completion of quarterly and/or annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for 6 of 31 residents reviewed for care planning (Resident #27, Resident #100, Resident #91, Resident #45, Resident #18, and Resident #21). The findings included: 1. Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The last care plan meeting documented in Resident #27's medical record was dated 7/9/2024. MDS assessments were completed for Resident #27 on the following dates: 9/16/2024 (quarterly), 11/11/2024 (quarterly), 1/10/2025 (quarterly) and 3/21/2025 (significant change). […]
Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 72 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jun 18, 2026Standard and complaint5 findings
- May 1, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Mar 27, 2025Standard and complaint7 findings · 1 harm
- Apr 26, 2024Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 8, 2024Standard3 findings
- Sep 1, 2022Standard and complaint16 findings
- May 20, 2021Standard and complaint7 findings
- Oct 16, 2020Complaint2 findings
Show the 11 earlier surveys
- Oct 4, 2019Standard4 findings
- Oct 10, 2018Standard4 findings
- Feb 2, 2018Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Dec 13, 2017Complaint4 findings · 3 harm
- Aug 24, 2017Standard2 findings
- Sep 22, 2016Standard1 finding
- Nov 13, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Oct 22, 2015Standard1 finding
- Sep 5, 2014Standard1 finding
- Aug 29, 2013—1 finding
- Jul 12, 2012—6 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction