Good Samaritan Society - Mountain Lake
Mountain Lake, Minnesota · CCN 245549
18 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2025.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 91
- Surveys
- 18
- Harm or worse
- 3
- Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 48
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY
- County
- Cottonwood · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1991
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 123 not-for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Minnesota.
Last survey on record
Aug 12, 2026
89 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.73 | 4.22 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.84 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 35.3% | 42.1% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $14,069 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J16.7% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G213.3% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D960.0% | E16.7% | F16.7% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C16.7% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6582×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
- F8122×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F5541×
Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
- F5801×
Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
- F6281×
Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Good Samaritan Society - Mountain Lake, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF684Feb 12, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed properly assess and monitor blood sugars, failed to identify signs and symptoms of hyperglycemia, and failed to follow continuous glucose monitor (CGM) manufacturer recommendations for placement and rechecking blood sugars for 1 of 4 residents (R1) who was admitted to intensive care unit with a blood sugar of over 1000 mg/dl (milligrams/deciliter). This resulted in an immediate jeopardy (IJ) for R1. The IJ began on 1/29/25, when R1 was demonstrating symptoms of hyperglycemia but R1's blood sugar according to the CGM was 52 mg/dl and was administered glucose tablets without confirming blood sugar via finger stick. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Apr 29, 2026
Based on interview and document review the facility failed to follow care planned fall interventions for 1 of 3 residents (R5) reviewed for falls. This resulted in actual harm when R5 fell and required a visit to the emergency department resulting in a fractured left femur and needed surgical intervention. The facility had implemented appropriate corrective action prior to the onsite investigation, so the deficiency is being cited at past non-compliance. Findings include:R5's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R5 had moderate cognitive impairment, needed substantial to maximal assistance with toileting, and needed partial to moderate assistance with toilet transfersR5's Face Sheet dated 6/23/23, indicated R5 had dementia.R5's care plan with intervention revision dated… […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF760Apr 29, 2026
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered to the correct resident for 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for medication errors. This failure resulted in actual harm for R3 when she developed bradycardia (abnormally slow heart rate) which required ongoing monitoring and intravenous therapy in the emergency department (ED). The facility had implemented appropriate corrective action prior to the onsite investigation, so the deficiency is being cited at past non-compliance. R3's Face Sheet dated 10/23/25, indicated R3 had dementia and Alzheimer's Disease. R3's [NAME] Accountability For Excellence (SAFE) Event Incident Report dated 3/25/26, indicated R3 was found with another resident's crushed medications in a drink. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jun 26, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and policy review, that facility failed to ensure beverageware and metal pans were completely dry before storing to prevent bacterial growth. This had potential to affect all 47 residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 6/24/24 at 11:37 a.m., with cook (C)-A observed multiple metal steam table pans stacked upside down, one on top of the other, on a wire shelving rack. When C-A removed the top pan, it had visible water on the inside surface. C-A acknowledged staff should not have put pans away while still wet as that could promote bacterial growth. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Apr 14, 2022
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to monitor the condition of food storage containers in the walk-in kitchen refrigerator resulting in mold growing on the outside of multiple containers. In addition, the facility failed to date-mark open containers of food stored in the walk-in kitchen refrigerator, and failed to ensure expired food was identified and removed. In addition, the facility failed to prevent cross-contamination when egg shells were stored with whole eggs. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the trained dietary manager oversaw and supervised all aspects of dietary services and ensured dietary cooks received comprehensive training upon hire and on-going. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 91 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 12, 2026Standard3 findings
- Apr 29, 2026Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
- Jul 3, 2025Standard and complaint3 findings
- Feb 12, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jun 26, 2024Standard4 findings
- Aug 16, 2023Standard1 finding
- Apr 14, 2022Standard13 findings
- Jul 29, 2021Complaint1 finding
Show the 10 earlier surveys
- Feb 21, 2020Standard4 findings
- Dec 6, 2018Standard9 findings
- Oct 5, 2017Standard6 findings
- Feb 16, 2017Standard7 findings
- Mar 17, 2016Standard5 findings
- Apr 9, 2015Standard7 findings
- Feb 27, 2014Standard11 findings
- Jun 6, 2013—4 findings
- Mar 23, 2012—6 findings
- May 12, 2011—3 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction