Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to identify a significant change in condition and provide timely medical intervention for 1 of 1 resident (R33) who had increasing, significant weight gain and other symptoms consistent with congestive heart failure (CHF) exacerbation. This resulted in actual harm for R33 when physician orders were not followed and appropriate, timely interventions for significant weight gain were not implemented. R33 was eventually admitted to the local hospital for IV diuretics (medication to remove fluid from the body) caused by CHF exacerbation. …
F658 citations in Minnesota
Professional standards of care · Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
Against expectation — 2025
Minnesota cites F658 less often than its own record predicts
0.37 times the national share — cited less often here than elsewhere.
Of every deficiency written in Minnesota in 2025, this is the portion that was F658.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Minnesota surveyors wrote
F658 findings written in Minnesota, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to follow standards of practice related to indwelling urinary catheter orders for 1 of 1 resident (R7) observed to use an indwelling urinary catheter.Findings include: R7's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R7 had a severe cognitive impairment and diagnoses that included benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)(an enlarged prostate), Alzheimer's disease, dementia and malignant neoplasm of the prostate (prostate cancer). …
The short window
Recent years
| Year | Share of Minnesota citations | vs expected |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 0.32% | 0.20× |
| 2024 | 0.63% | 0.38× |
| 2025 | 0.66% | 0.37× |
Shares of citations, not counts: earlier years hold fewer inspections.
What else Minnesota surveyors cite →
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction