Deficiency Index

F658 citations in Maine

Professional standards of care · Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies

Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

F658 in Maine. Pick another state for the same tag.

Against expectation — 2025

Maine cites F658 less often than its own record predicts

Versus expected share0.15×

0.15 times the national share — cited less often here than elsewhere.

Share of Maine citations0.26%

Of every deficiency written in Maine in 2025, this is the portion that was F658.

Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.

In the surveyor’s words

What Maine surveyors wrote

F658 findings written in Maine, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.

Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.

E · No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternDecember 4, 2025

Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered safely, accurately, and in accordance with provider orders and professional standards of practice for 1 of 3 medication administration observations reviewed. (Resident #14 & #33) On 12/2/25, at approximately 8:15 a.m., during a medication administration observation on the second floor, the surveyor observed the Infection Preventionist (IP) open the top drawer of the medication cart and remove a small plastic bag containing a syringe labeled Omeprazole for Resident #14. …

Coastal Manor

The short window

Recent years

YearShare of Maine citationsvs expected
20230.32%0.20×
20240.13%0.08×
20250.26%0.15×

Shares of citations, not counts: earlier years hold fewer inspections.

What else Maine surveyors cite →

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction