Good Samaritan Society - Albert Lea
Albert Lea, Minnesota · CCN 245441
20 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2018.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 59
- Surveys
- 20
- Harm or worse
- 5
- Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
- 2
Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 80
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY
- County
- Freeborn · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1987
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 52 not-for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Minnesota.
Last survey on record
May 13, 2026
180 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.64 | 4.39 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.55 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 23.8% | 37.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $17,345 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J16.7% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G16.7% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1066.7% | E— | F320.0% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8122×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F8802×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F5581×
Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
- F5781×
Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
- F6001×
Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Good Samaritan Society - Albert Lea, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Feb 11, 2025
Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to protect 2 of 2 female residents (R2, R1) resident's right to be free from sexual abuse and sexaully inappropriate behaviors by male resident (R3). This deficient practice resulted in an immediate jeopardy (IJ) for R1 who had severe cognitive impairment and unable to give consent, however, a reasonable person would have experienced severe psychosocial harm-dehumanization, and humiliation as a result of the sexual abuse. The immediate jeopardy (IJ) began on 2/5/25, at approximately 10:00 a.m. when R3 was in the dining room unsupervised and found rubbing R1's breasts who was unable to leave the area on her own. The IJ was identified on 2/11/25, and the administrator was notified of the IJ on 2/11/25, at 6:00 p.m. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Jul 2, 2021
Based on interview, and document review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and notify law enforcement in a timely manner for 1 of 1 resident (R1) reviewed for elopement that resulted in an immediate jeopardy (IJ). The facility failed to call law enforcement for approximately 34 to 41 minutes once known R1 had been visualized off facility grounds and unable to locate. This resulted in R1 driving his motorized wheelchair on a busy road with a narrow shoulder into town, purchased a knife at a local store and committed suicide. The immediate jeopardy began on [DATE], when R1 exited the facility unattended in his electric wheelchair and inflicted self harm approximately one mile from the facility that resulted in death. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Sep 11, 2024
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide safe transfers and follow the care plan to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for falls. The facility's failure resulted in harm when R1 fell and sustained a left hip fracture that required surgical intervention. The facility implemented immediate corrective actions prior to survey and is issued at past non-compliance. Findings include: R1's quarterly Minimum Date Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 did not have cognitive impairment. R1's diagnoses included legally blind and diabetes. R1 required one staff assist for staff transfers, toileting hygiene, upper and lower body dressing, and walking. R1 received anticoagulants (blood thinning medications). […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812May 13, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure food stored in the refrigerators were labeled, dated and discarded properly. In addition, the facility failed to ensure pans were completely dry before storing, utensils were covered or placed in drawers, and personal items from staff were not allowed in the food prep area. These findings had the potential to affect all 69 residents who were served food from the kitchen. Findings include: During the initial kitchen tour on 5/11/26, commencing at 9:48 a.m., with the manager of nutrition and food services (MNFS)-C, the following observations were made: In a walk-in refrigerator, observed opened and dated food stored past the facility seven-day window per their policy, as well as two opened and undated… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Apr 24, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure safe operating temperature of high-temperature dish washing machine. This had the potential to affect all 73 residents, staff and visitors who may use washed equipment from the facility kitchen. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 4/23/25 at 11:42 a.m., the dietary manager (DM) stated 3 empty dish racks are sent through the dish machine prior to actual dirty dishes to ensure proper operating temperatures. Proper wash temperature should be 150-degrees and proper rinse temperature should be 180-degrees. The DM sent 3 empty dish racks through and noted the wash and rinse temperature were both approximately 140-degrees. […]
Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 59 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- May 13, 2026Standard2 findings
- Apr 24, 2025Standard4 findings
- Feb 11, 2025Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 11, 2024Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 10, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Feb 2, 2024Standard3 findings
- Feb 9, 2023Standard3 findings
- Mar 24, 2022Complaint1 finding
Show the 12 earlier surveys
- Jul 2, 2021Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jun 17, 2021Standard3 findings
- May 16, 2019Standard1 finding
- Oct 19, 2018Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 2, 2018Standard3 findings · 1 harm
- Apr 27, 2017Standard2 findings
- Feb 25, 2016Standard10 findings
- Jan 29, 2015Standard3 findings
- Feb 6, 2014Standard3 findings
- Apr 18, 2013—6 findings
- Aug 4, 2011—4 findings
- Oct 21, 2010—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction