Deficiency Index

Assumption Home

Cold Spring, Minnesota · CCN 245446

25 surveys since 2011, 5 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
89
Surveys
25
Harm or worse
5
Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
1
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file20/25

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
76
Ownership
Non profit - Church related
Chain
BENEDICTINE HEALTH SYSTEM
County
Stearns
Medicare-certified since
1987

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
3
Staffing
5
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 52 not-for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Minnesota.

Last survey on record

Nov 20, 2025

354 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.014.39
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.68—
Annual nurse turnover44.1%37.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$17,345 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ14.5%K—L—
Actual harmG14.5%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1568.2%E29.1%F29.1%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B14.5%C—
CMS’s current file: 22 of the 89 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6092×

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

  • F6232×

    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.

  • F6892×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F5501×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F5521×

    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Assumption Home, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Nov 20, 2025

    Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure the appropriate size sling was used and the straps on the EZ Way sling were secured to the mechanical EZ Way smart lift during transfer of 1 of 2 residents (R13) reviewed for mechanical lift transfers. This failure resulted in Immediate Jeopardy to resident health and safety when the loop for the lift sling was not secured properly causing it to come undone. This resulted in R13 sliding out of the sling and falling to the floor. R13 and sustained an abrasion to the posterior head (right side).The Immediate Jeopardy began on 8/3/25 when R13 slid out of the lift sling. The administrator was notified of the immediate jeopardy at 9:02 a.m. on 11/20/25. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Aug 14, 2024

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a full body mechanical lift was used per manufacturers recommendations for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for mechanical lift use. This resulted in actual harm for R1 when staff failed to ensure the lift sling was secured prior to transfer causing R1 to fall from the lift causing pain and a fractured clavicle. Findings include: R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R1 had intact cognition and required assistance with all activities of daily living (ADL)'s. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Feb 14, 2023

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess fall risk and implement individualized interventions to reduce the risk of falls for 2 of 3 residents (R1, R3) reviewed for accidents. This resulted in actual harm for R1 who sustained fractures and for R3 who sustained a subdural hematoma after repeated falls and whom both required medical treatment or services. Findings include: R1's Inpatient Discharge Summary, dated 11/16/22, identified R1 fell three times prior to her hospital admission in which she sustained nasal fractures, left great toe fracture, distal right fibula fracture, and a left wrist fracture. She was discharged to the facility in stable condition with a good rehab potential and was expected to require services for less than 30 days. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF867Jan 19, 2023

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to develop and implement appropriate action plans to correct quality deficiencies identified during the survey that the facility was aware of or should have been aware of. This deficient practice had the potential to affect at 56 residents currently residing in the facility. Findings include: During an interview on 01/19/23 at 2:30 PM, the Infection Preventionist (IP) revealed there was no month to month tracking or line list surveillance for the residents to track any potential health care acquired infections. The only tracking being done was if residents had COVID-19. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Jan 19, 2023

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Infection Control policies were reviewed annually and failed to conduct ongoing surveillance for healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) in the facility. This had the potential to affect all 56 residents in the facility. Findings include: During an interview on 01/19/23, at 1:49 p.m. the Infection Preventionist (IP) revealed the overall infection control policies were not reviewed in the last year. During an interview on 01/19/23, at 3:29 p.m. the Interim administrator and the director of nursing (DON) explained the facility does not have a process in place to review the Infection Control Policies and were not aware they needed to be updated annually. During an interview on 01/19/23, at 2:30 p.m. […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 89 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Nov 20, 2025Standard7 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 14, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • May 14, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 1, 2023Standard2 findings
  • Feb 14, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jan 19, 2023Standard11 findings
  • Jan 11, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 18, 2022Complaint1 finding
Show the 17 earlier surveys
  • Mar 10, 2022Standard5 findings
  • Jan 11, 2022Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 3, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Nov 16, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Apr 9, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Jan 30, 2020Standard and complaint10 findings
  • Aug 9, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 16, 2018Standard2 findings
  • Feb 15, 2018Standard3 findings
  • Nov 3, 2016Standard5 findings
  • Dec 2, 2015Standard1 finding
  • Oct 30, 2014Standard1 finding
  • Jan 29, 2014Standard6 findings
  • Jun 5, 2013—2 findings
  • Mar 14, 2013—1 finding · 1 harm
  • Aug 23, 2012—8 findings
  • Aug 11, 2011—12 findings · 1 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction