Deficiency Index

Desert Regional Medical Center D/P SNF

Palm Springs, California · CCN 555417

22 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2024.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
99
Surveys
22
Harm or worse
1
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file15/22

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
32
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Riverside
Medicare-certified since
1990

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
5
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 252 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in California.

Last survey on record

Jun 11, 2026

151 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day8.104.36
Registered-nurse hours per resident day5.26—
Annual nurse turnover15.8%36.4%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$14,043 across 1 penalty
Payment denials
1

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L13.2%
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1445.2%E929.0%F722.6%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 31 of the 99 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8043×

    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.

  • F8123×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F5782×

    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.

  • F5802×

    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

  • F7552×

    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Desert Regional Medical Center D/P SNF, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, widespreadF812Feb 29, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in a sanitary manner, in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, as evidenced by: 1. Rodent droppings and evidence of nesting (collection of clutter, trash, and debris) was found in the cooking line area of the kitchen, as well as an accumulation of grease and black grime and food, this had the potential to transmit disease to patients by contaminating food and food contact surfaces. In addition, a convection oven (oven that has fans to circulate air around food), a steamer, three ovens, one fryer and a broiler had an accumulation of grease and food grime build-up. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Aug 21, 2025

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food preparation and storage practices in the kitchen when: 1. One bag containing a yellow and orange colored liquid was stored in the walk-in refrigerator unlabeled and undated. 2. One package of small, round and brown dessert item was stored in the portable walk-in freezer unlabeled and undated. 3. One sandwich was stored in the resident's refrigerator inside the nourishment room unlabeled, undated, and readily available for use. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illness (stomach illness acquired from ingesting contaminated food) in a medically vulnerable population of 23 residents who receive food in the facility. Findings: 1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF814Aug 21, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper disposal of garbage when multiple debris items were found on the ground outside of the designated container and not stored in the appropriate container. This failure had the potential to attract pests and cause infection control issues.Findings:On August 18, 2025, at 11:05 a.m., during a concurrent observation and interview with the Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS), in front of the dumpster storage area, multiple debris items including, wood scraps, pallets, and cardboard were observed on the ground and surrounding area. The DSS stated there should not be any debris, wood scraps, pallets, or carboard on the ground and around the dumpster compactor machine. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF803Feb 29, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the lunch menu served on February 27, 2024, met the nutritional need of 15 out of 16 residents in accordance with established national guidelines. This failure had the potential for residents not to receive the caloric intake needed, when the established menu was not followed, which could result in poor nutrition and further compromise the residents' medical status. Findings: An observation and concurrent interview were conducted on February 26, 2024, at 12:20 p.m., with Resident 227. Resident 227 stated, he should receive double-portions, and only received one scoop of potatoes today. Resident 227 stated, sometimes the facility messed up the order and he had to wait 45 minutes for the missing food. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF925Feb 29, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to keep the facility free of pests and rodents when: 1. There were rodent droppings and evidence of nesting found in the cooking line; 2. There was not a set schedule for the pest control company to service the kitchen; and 3. Recommendations made by the pest control company were never implemented. These failures created an environment attracting rodents and the potential contamination of food and kitchen equipment used to supply meals to 15 out of 16 vulnerable residents, who are put at risk for food-borne illness (caused by food contaminated with bacteria, viruses, parasites, and toxins). […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 99 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 11, 2026Standard4 findings
  • Aug 21, 2025Standard8 findings
  • Jan 14, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 1, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 29, 2024Standard7 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 3, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 1, 2022Standard9 findings
  • Nov 22, 2022Complaint2 findings
Show the 14 earlier surveys
  • Jul 14, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 30, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Aug 22, 2019Standard2 findings
  • Sep 7, 2018Standard3 findings
  • May 16, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 11, 2017Standard3 findings
  • Oct 13, 2016Standard5 findings
  • Jun 8, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • May 17, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 1, 2015Standard9 findings
  • Oct 29, 2014Standard10 findings
  • Nov 7, 2013—7 findings
  • Nov 17, 2011—11 findings
  • Jan 13, 2011—9 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction