Deficiency Index

Ashby Care Center

Berkeley, California · CCN 555466

36 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2019.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
125
Surveys
36
Harm or worse
3
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file28/36

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
31
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Alameda
Medicare-certified since
1991

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
2
Staffing
5
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 252 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in California.

Last survey on record

Jun 9, 2026

153 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.274.36
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.70—
Annual nurse turnover21.7%36.4%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$66,134 across 1 penalty
Payment denials
1

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG25.1%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD923.1%E1333.3%F1230.8%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B37.7%C—
CMS’s current file: 39 of the 125 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6793×

    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.

  • F7553×

    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F9123×

    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.

  • F5652×

    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Ashby Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF684Apr 10, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not provide the necessary pain medication for one of three sampled residents (Resident 3) Resident 3 required wound dressing changes, three times per week, which were painful and required premedication. The licensed nursing staff did not administer the required pain medication before wound care. This caused unnecessary pain and distress for Resident 3. Findings: Review of the Admission Record showed the facility admitted Resident 3 on 3/11/2023. The diagnoses included dementia (memory difficulty). Resident 3 received hospice services (end-of-life comfort care) while at the facility. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF656Oct 13, 2023

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to correctly identify one (Resident 1) of three sampled residents as a high fall risk and revise the fall care plan accordingly and as needed to maintain Resident 1's physical well-being. This failure resulted in an uwitnessed fall and Resident 1 sustained a subdural hematoma (a collection of blood in the top of the brain), left humeral head fracture (broken upper arm bone) and fracture of the pubic ramus (broken bone in the pelvis) requiring hospitalization . Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included muscle weakness, cancer of the spine, difficulty in walking, abnormalities of gait (manner of walking), and mobility. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF755May 22, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the hospital failed to ensure the accuracy of controlled drug records as evidenced by: 1. The facility failed to ensure the scheduled (narcotic) medication records (Controlled Drug Record, MAR) were accurate. For three (Residents 160, 165, 167) out of three residents sampled, the Controlled Drug Record (inventory of scheduled drug) and the Medication Administration Record (MAR, record of drug administration) were not accurate. This failure resulted in the potential for residents to be exposed to avoidable medication errors. In addition, this failure resulted in the potential for scheduled drug diversion. 2. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF565Oct 20, 2023

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to facilitate the resident's right to organize resident group (council) meetings. The group council meetings stopped during the COVID-19 (a respiratory virus that is easily spread causing mild, moderate, or serious illness) lockdown and were never resumed. There was no designated staff person approved by the residents to be responsible for assisting and responding to the resident's concerns or requests that result from group meetings. This failure had the potential to cause residents emotional distress and a decline in their quality of life. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF679Oct 20, 2023

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing activity program to support residents in their choice of activities. The facility did not have an active activity program or staff responsible for providing assistance with the activities program. This failure had the potential to cause residents emotional distress and decline in their quality of life. Findings: 1. Review of Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment screening tool used to guide care), dated 4/21/23, indicated: Resident 3's Basic Interview of Mental status (BIMS- score was 14 meaning cognitively intact). Resident 3's activity preferences included listening to music, doing things with groups of people and participate in religious services or practices that were very important. […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 125 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 9, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 5, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • May 22, 2025Standard10 findings
  • May 8, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 10, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Oct 20, 2023Standard18 findings
  • Oct 13, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • May 27, 2023Complaint1 finding
Show the 28 earlier surveys
  • Jan 23, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • May 6, 2022Infection control4 findings
  • Jul 28, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 16, 2021Standard4 findings
  • Jan 13, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 25, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 3, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 12, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 12, 2019Standard5 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 12, 2018Standard8 findings
  • Apr 19, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 20, 2017Standard6 findings
  • Jul 12, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 30, 2016Standard3 findings
  • Sep 24, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 23, 2015Standard15 findings
  • Jun 22, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 16, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 5, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 7, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 13, 2014Standard6 findings
  • Apr 24, 2013—1 finding
  • Apr 19, 2013—4 findings
  • Feb 13, 2013—1 finding
  • Feb 7, 2013—1 finding
  • Sep 12, 2012—3 findings
  • Aug 31, 2012—4 findings
  • Sep 9, 2011—8 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction