Deficiency Index

Chesaning Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

Chesaning, Michigan · CCN 235641

25 surveys since 2010, 9 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
151
Surveys
25
Harm or worse
9
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2025
’10’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse9

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file18/25

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
51
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
Independent
County
Saginaw
Medicare-certified since
2008

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
3
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 71 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Michigan.

Last survey on record

Dec 12, 2025

332 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.573.86
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.79—
Annual nurse turnover43.9%45.9%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$32,587 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG25.0%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2050.0%E1537.5%F37.5%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 40 of the 151 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6933×

    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F5502×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F6572×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

  • F6582×

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Chesaning Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Oct 17, 2023

    This Citation pertains to Intake Number MI00138042. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility 1) Failed to provide care following professional standards of practice and facility policy to prevent the development of avoidable pressure injuries, 2) Failed to accurately measure and stage residents' pressure injuries, and 3) Failed to promptly identify and provide necessary treatment for a deteriorating pressure injury for four residents (Resident #192, Resident #6, Resident #13, and Resident #26) reviewed for pressure injuries, resulting in R192 requiring emergent surgical intervention for sepsis and acute osteomyelitis of a Stage 4 sacral wound. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF637Sep 1, 2023

    This citation pertains to intake #MI00138565. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to, 1) ensure a complete and accurate nursing assessment was done after a significant change involving 1 resident (Resident #701), and 2) ensure the facility had a policy to follow for assessment regarding signs/symptoms of infection (not feeling well, increased temp, tiredness, nausea), resulting in hospitalization with a diagnosis of urinary tract infection (UTI) and sepsis (extensive infection), antibiotic given, and the likelihood for serious injury. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Jul 20, 2022

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement preventive measures to prevent 2 Stage II (blisters) heel pressure ulcers for 1 resident (Resident #26) of 3 resident's review for pressure ulcers, resulting in 2 bi-lateral Stage II heel pressure ulcers, pain, discomfort, agitation and wound treatments. Findings Include: Stage two pressure ulcer is partial-thickness skin loss involving epidermis or dermis, or both. The ulcer is superficial and presents as an abrasion, shallow center or blister. High risk residents (immobile, bed bound) should be assessed weekly, when a condition, change or as needed and preventive measures should be in place including pressure relieving devices, position changes, and dietary supplements. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686May 25, 2022

    This Citation Pertains to Intake Number MI 371 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess, monitor and ensure appropriate interventions were ordered and provided to prevent worsening of pressure ulcers for 2 residents (Resident #100 and Resident #102) of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, resulting in Resident #100 developing a facility-acquired Stage 4 (National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP): Full-thickness loss of skin and tissue with exposed or directly palpable fascia, muscle, tendon, ligament, cartilage or bone in the ulcer .) pressure ulcer on the sacrum with no ordered treatment until 12 days after admission and Resident #102 was readmitted with a right buttock/sacral pressure ulcer (Stage 3: NPIAP- Full thickness skin loss in which adipose… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Dec 12, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain best practices in the food service area, resulting in the potential to spread food borne illness to all residents who consume food from the kitchen. Findings include:On 12/09/2025 at approximately 11:30 AM during lunch observation with the Certified Dietary Manager E, the rag sanitizer bucket solution was tested with Hydrion QT-40 test strips, and the result was zero. On 12/09/2025 at approximately 11:30 AM during lunch observation with the CDM E, when interviewed on the chemical solution of the rag sanitizer bucket, the CDM E stated that the bucket needed to be changed out, and it is changed when it's visibly soiled or every 2 hours. […]

Read 29 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 29 of 151 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Dec 12, 2025Standard11 findings
  • Aug 20, 2025Complaint3 findings
  • Mar 27, 2025Complaint3 findings
  • Oct 21, 2024Standard12 findings
  • Sep 16, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 17, 2023Standard8 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 1, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jul 20, 2022Standard12 findings · 1 harm
Show the 17 earlier surveys
  • May 25, 2022Infection control1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jul 16, 2021Standard7 findings
  • May 6, 2021Complaint4 findings
  • Apr 30, 2020Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Mar 3, 2020Complaint2 findings
  • May 7, 2019Standard15 findings
  • Jun 20, 2018Standard5 findings
  • Apr 25, 2017Standard22 findings · 1 harm
  • Jun 29, 2016Standard5 findings
  • May 29, 2015Standard9 findings
  • May 7, 2015Complaint3 findings
  • Dec 11, 2014Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 24, 2014Standard3 findings
  • Jul 3, 2013—6 findings
  • Aug 23, 2012—4 findings
  • Nov 4, 2011—8 findings
  • Sep 20, 2010—2 findings · 2 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction