Deficiency Index

The Laurels of Fulton

Perrinton, Michigan · CCN 235513

26 surveys since 2011, 12 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
124
Surveys
26
Harm or worse
12
Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
2
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file19/26

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
50
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
CIENA HEALTHCARE/LAUREL HEALTH CARE
County
Gratiot · rural
Medicare-certified since
1991

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
2
Staffing
4
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 71 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Michigan.

Last survey on record

Dec 18, 2025

326 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.813.86
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.79—
Annual nurse turnover37.5%45.9%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$51,943 across 2 penalties

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ13.4%K—L—
Actual harmG413.8%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2069.0%E26.9%F26.9%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 29 of the 124 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6893×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F6072×

    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.

  • F6092×

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6572×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at The Laurels of Fulton, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Oct 8, 2025

    This citation pertains to intake 2636578Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement measures to prevent the elopement from the facility for one resident known to be at risk for elopement (R101) of four residents reviewed resulting in an Immediate Jeopardy that began on 9/21/25 when R101 left the facility unbeknownst to staff which created a high likelihood for serious harm, injury, and/or death. Findings include: Review of the admission Record reflected R101 originally admitted to the facility 9/19/23 and had pertinent diagnoses that included Alzheimer's Disease, Dementia with Mood Disturbance and Major Depressive Disorder - recurrent and severe with Psychotic Symptoms. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF657Nov 21, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised for one resident (Resident #8) out of 13 residents reviewed for quality care, resulting in hospitalization for a fracture sustained after a fall from staff use of the incorrect lift device. Findings: Resident #8 (R8) Review of an Admission Record reflected R8 admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included generalized osteoarthritis, hemiplegia and hemiparesis (weakness and partial paralysis) of the left non-dominant side following a stroke, history of traumatic brain injury and muscle weakness. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Nov 21, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to 1.) implement the facility policy for pressure injury/wound management, 2.) ensure pressure injury/wound assessments were comprehensive and accurate, and 3.) ensure treatments were promptly ordered and completed, for 2 of 13 residents (Resident #17 and #1) reviewed for alterations in skin integrity, resulting the development of preventable pressure injuries and the worsening of wounds. Findings: Resident #17 (R17) Review of an Admission Record revealed R17 was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: chronic respiratory failure, chronic heart failure, and diabetes. R17 was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Nov 21, 2024

    This citation pertains to intake #MI00148210 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide enhanced supervision and assistance to residents with acute medical changes and significant medication changes, for two of five residents (Resident #32 and Resident #16) reviewed, resulting in a fractured left arm and a brain bleed for Resident #32 and a fractured right arm for Resident #16. Findings: Resident #32 (R32) Review of an Admission Record revealed R32 was an [AGE] year old female, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnosis of seizure disorder, stroke with impaired speech, congestive heart failure, morbid obesity, impaired vision, muscle weakness, and pain in both knees. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Nov 9, 2023

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent facility acquired pressure injuries and provide pressure injury preventative care consistent with professional standards of practice for 3 residents (Resident #94, #37, and #193) reviewed for the risk of and/or the development of pressure injuries, resulting in the development of an avoidable pressure injury, the worsening of a pressure injury, and the potential for skin breakdown and overall deterioration in health status. Findings: Resident #94 (R94) Review of an Admission Record reflected R94 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included traumatic brain injury, respiratory failure and a urinary tract infection. […]

Read 28 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 28 of 124 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Dec 18, 2025Standard13 findings
  • Oct 8, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Nov 21, 2024Standard and complaint7 findings · 3 harm
  • Aug 23, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 9, 2023Standard3 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 4, 2023Complaint3 findings
  • Jul 18, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 19, 2022Standard15 findings · 3 harm
Show the 18 earlier surveys
  • Jul 22, 2021Standard4 findings
  • Jan 2, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 8, 2019Standard12 findings
  • Jul 3, 2018Standard and complaint11 findings · 1 harm
  • Feb 28, 2018Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • May 23, 2017Standard9 findings
  • May 18, 2016Standard8 findings
  • Apr 30, 2015Standard and complaint3 findings
  • Jul 28, 2014Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 14, 2014Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jun 26, 2014Standard4 findings
  • Jun 3, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 7, 2014—1 finding
  • Jul 25, 2013—12 findings
  • Apr 10, 2013—1 finding
  • Dec 19, 2012—1 finding
  • Sep 7, 2012—4 findings
  • Sep 29, 2011—3 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction