F550 in Michigan. Pick another state for the same tag.
Against expectation — 2025
Michigan cites F550 more often than its own record predicts
Versus expected share1.57×
1.57 times the share F550 takes of citations nationally.
Share of Michigan citations3.34%
Of every deficiency written in Michigan in 2025, this is the portion that was F550.
Michigan3.34%
National2.13%
Share of all citations that were F550.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Michigan surveyors wrote
F550 findings written in Michigan, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
J · Immediate jeopardy, isolatedJuly 26, 2018
This citation pertains to MI 232
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to honor one resident's rights when she became unresponsive and the the facility failed to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), failed to obtain resident advance directives, and failed to deem one resident (Resident #105) incompetent to make her own medical decisions, out of 9 residents reviewed for advance directives and code status, resulting in an immediate jeopardy when Resident #105 did not recieve CPR per her last known code status.
Findings include:
According to a facility face sheet dated [DATE] at 8:34 p.m., Resident #105 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the Diagnoses: [REDACTED]. …
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to allow one resident (R210) to discharge from the facility at her request until the Ombudsman intervened on 6/27/24 of six residents reviewed for resident rights, resulting in psychological distress, depression, and physical attempts at leaving the facility.
Findings include:
On 7/2/24 at 1:13 PM an interview with the Ombudsman was held by telephone. The Ombudsman said that on 6/27/24 following a telephone interview with R210 and R210's significant other the Ombudsman came to the facility. R210 had explained to the Ombudsman that attempts were made for 2 days to discharge AMA from the facility and the requests were refused. The Ombudsman obtained permission from R210 to advocate for discharge rights. …
D · No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedAugust 27, 2026
This Citation pertains to Intake Numbers 3133404 and 3133393. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to promote dignity and ensure availability of resident incontinence products for one (#702) of three residents reviewed.Findings include:Resident #702Review of intake documentation dated as received 8/3/26 revealed a concern pertaining to Resident #702 as follows:Resident #702 utilizes briefs due to incontinence and limited mobility. The intake detailed the facility ran out of incontinence briefs over the weekend and facility staff instructed the Resident to urinate and defecate directly in their bed and that the facility staff would put some pad underneath them to attempt and absorb the urine which necessitated a complete bed change every time, as the pad… …
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction