Deficiency Index

Brian Center of Alleghany

Low Moor, Virginia · CCN 495221

7 surveys since 2012. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2016.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
26
Surveys
7
Harm or worse
1
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2012–2024
’12’15’20’24
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse1

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file5/7

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
89
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
Independent
County
Alleghany · rural
Medicare-certified since
1990

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
5
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=10, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Jan 24, 2024

1,020 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.823.42
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.11—
Annual nurse turnover31.8%47.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1083.3%E216.7%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 12 of the 26 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6572×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

  • F5781×

    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.

  • F6551×

    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted

  • F6561×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6951×

    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Brian Center of Alleghany, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF657Jan 24, 2024

    Based on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for two of twenty-three residents in the survey sample (Residents #57 and #61). The findings include: 1. Resident #57 did not have a comprehensive care plan review/meeting conducted by the interdisciplinary team, including the resident and/or family member, after each minimum data set (MDS) for over a year. Resident #57 (R57) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), emphysema, gastroesophageal reflux disease, chronic respiratory failure, osteoarthritis, peripheral vascular disease, osteoporosis, depression and protein-calorie malnutrition. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Jan 24, 2024

    Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to implement infection control practices to prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infections on 2 of 5 units, which had the potential of affect multiple residents. The findings included: 1. For Resident #18, who was on transmission-based precautions, the facility staff failed to wear proper PPE (personal protective equipment) while providing care, to prevent the transmission of infection(s) within the facility. On 1/22/24 at 11 am, resident #18 was observed from the hallway. It was noted that on the room door frame there was a sign that indicated Stop: Contact precautions. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF578Jan 24, 2024

    Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and state code, the facility staff failed to document a valid do not resuscitate order form for one of twenty-three residents in the survey sample (Resident 59). The findings include: Resident #59's durable do not resuscitate order form (DDNR), a portable, state-issued form communicating the resident's DNR status when transported outside of the nursing facility, was incomplete and included no required signatures of the physician or the resident's authorized representative. Resident #59 (R59) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included diabetes, neuropathy, dysphagia, cerebral infarction with hemiparesis, dementia, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, anxiety, chronic kidney disease and insomnia. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF655Jan 24, 2024

    Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for one Resident (Resident #234) in a survey sample of 23 Residents, which should to direct the patient centered care of the resident. The findings included: On 1/23/24, a clinical record review was conducted of Resident #234's chart. This revealed that Resident #234 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], but the baseline care plan was not developed until 1/22/24. On 1/23/24, the unit manager/LPN #4, was asked about the baseline care plan for Resident #234. LPN #4 provided the surveyor with a 3-ring binder that was kept at the nursing station that contained baseline care plans. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF656Jan 24, 2024

    Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review the facility failed to develop a care plan for one of 23 residents. Resident #1 (R1) had an admitting diagnosis of PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder), and a care plan was not developed. The Findings Include: Diagnoses for R1 included: PTSD, anxiety, depression, and obsessive-compulsive disorder. The most current MDS (minimum data set) was a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 12/17/23. R1 was assessed with a cognitive score of 12 indicating cognitively intact. A review of the Trauma Informed Screen assessment dated [DATE] revealed R1 was in Vietnam and did not reveal any other information related to PTSD. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 26 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jan 24, 2024Standard10 findings
  • Oct 2, 2019Standard2 findings
  • Sep 28, 2016Standard1 finding · 1 harm
  • Sep 2, 2015Standard1 finding
  • Dec 18, 2014Standard and complaint6 findings
  • Nov 20, 2013—4 findings
  • Nov 15, 2012—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction