Barbour Court Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
Smithfield, North Carolina · CCN 345237
31 surveys since 2010, 10 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 134
- Surveys
- 31
- Harm or worse
- 10
- Immediate jeopardy
- 7
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 165
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- PRINCIPLE LONG TERM CARE
- County
- Johnston
- Medicare-certified since
- 1983
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 92 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in North Carolina.
Last survey on record
Feb 26, 2026
256 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.15 | 3.49 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.53 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 33.0% | 52.4% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1071.4% | E321.4% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C17.1% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F5782×
Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
- F7612×
Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
- F5761×
Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
- F6021×
Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
- F6411×
Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Barbour Court Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Apr 8, 2022
Based on observations, interviews with facility staff and the physician and record review the facility failed to prevent a severely cognitively impaired resident (Resident #102) from exiting the facility without supervision for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for accidents. Receptionist #1 let Resident #102 out of the locked front door, without notifying nursing staff and he was left outside unattended and out of visual sight of the facility staff. There was a high likelihood of Resident #102 suffering serious harm. The findings included: Resident #102 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF641Feb 26, 2026
Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment in the areas of medications (Resident #8, Resident #4, and Resident #5) and Pneumococcal Vaccine (Resident #18). This was for 4 of 28 residents whose MDS assessments were reviewed.Findings included:a. Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Resident #8's physician orders included Novolog (a rapid acting insulin) injection solution 100 units/milliliter inject 10 units subcutaneously (beneath the skin) with meals. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF578Nov 15, 2024
Based on record review and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a copy of the resident's advanced directive was included in the resident's record (Resident #10) and failed to provide written advance directive information and/or an opportunity to formulate an advance directive (Residents #18, #51, and #84). This was for 4 of 17 residents reviewed for advance directives. The findings included: a. A review of the facility's policy titled Documentation of Advanced Directives dated 2/2007 revealed in part It is the policy of the facility to document in the residents' medical record whether or not the resident has executed an advanced directive. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF657Nov 15, 2024
Based on record review, resident, Resident Representative (RR) and staff interviews, the facility failed to conduct care plan meetings or invite residents to their care plan meetings for 4 of 9 residents reviewed for care plans (Residents #39, #40, #100, and 117). Findings included: 1. Resident #39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease and aphasia (unable to speak). The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] indicated that Resident #39 was severely cognitively impaired. An interview on 11/12/24 at 11:13 AM with Resident #39's Resident Representative (RR) revealed she had not been invited to a care plan meeting since Resident #39's admission. She stated she would like to attend a care plan meeting. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF657Apr 8, 2022
Based on record review and staff, resident, and resident representative interviews the facility failed to invite a resident or resident representative to participate in the development or revision of the care plan for 5 of 8 residents reviewed for care plan meetings (Resident #91, Resident #16, Resident #46, Resident #97, and Resident #43). Findings included: 1. Resident #91 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His active diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Resident #91's Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was assessed as cognitively intact. […]
Read 29 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 29 of 134 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Feb 26, 2026Standard3 findings
- Nov 15, 2024Standard and complaint5 findings
- Sep 1, 2023Standard and complaint6 findings
- Apr 8, 2022Standard and complaint15 findings · 1 harm
- Dec 13, 2021Complaint2 findings
- Nov 5, 2021Complaint3 findings
- Sep 9, 2021Complaint4 findings
- Dec 10, 2020Infection control1 finding
Show the 23 earlier surveys
- Oct 26, 2020Complaint5 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 21, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Mar 10, 2020Standard and complaint13 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 14, 2020Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
- Apr 15, 2019Standard and complaint14 findings
- Jul 3, 2018Complaint3 findings
- May 8, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Apr 20, 2018Standard and complaint6 findings
- Jan 24, 2017Complaint7 findings
- Apr 13, 2016Complaint3 findings
- Mar 3, 2016Standard2 findings
- Oct 1, 2015Complaint2 findings
- May 20, 2015Standard and complaint3 findings
- Mar 13, 2015Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jun 26, 2014Standard7 findings
- Sep 5, 2013—2 findings
- May 9, 2013—6 findings
- Jun 7, 2012—4 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 18, 2012—2 findings
- Nov 21, 2011—2 findings
- May 5, 2011—3 findings
- Feb 22, 2011—3 findings · 3 harm
- Dec 8, 2010—2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction