Deficiency Index

Franklin Oaks Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

Louisburg, North Carolina · CCN 345335

17 surveys since 2010, 3 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
77
Surveys
17
Harm or worse
3
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse3

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file14/17

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
166
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
PRINCIPLE LONG TERM CARE
County
Franklin
Medicare-certified since
1990

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
3
Staffing
3
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 92 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in North Carolina.

Last survey on record

May 8, 2025

550 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.393.49
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.35—
Annual nurse turnover28.6%52.4%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG15.6%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1055.6%E633.3%F15.6%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 18 of the 77 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8672×

    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.

  • F5501×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F5531×

    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.

  • F5801×

    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

  • F5851×

    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Franklin Oaks Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF550Jan 12, 2023

    Based on observations, record review, resident and staff interview the facility failed to maintain residents ' dignity by failing to provide incontinence care when a nurse aide (NA #2) told a resident he would have to wait (Resident # 36). This made Resident #36 feel embarrassed and uncared for. The facility also failed to maintain a residents' dignity by allowing a resident to sit in a soiled brief during her meal (Resident #235). Resident #325 stated she felt like poop and complained of being uncomfortable and burning to her skin. This occurred for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #36, Resident #235) reviewed for dignity and respect. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF814May 8, 2025

    Based on observations and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure the dumpster was maintained free of leakage and pooled spillage for 1 of 1 dumpster. This practice had the potential to attract pests and rodents. The findings included: On 5/07/25 at 1:58 PM the dumpster area was observed. The middle bottom rim of the 22-foot-long compact dumpster was observed with a 6 inch by 4-inch buildup of gray sludge on the exterior side. From the sludge a large pool of milky grey liquid puddled, 6 feet long beside and underneath the dumpster. A second observation of the dumpster on 5/08/25 at 9:25 AM revealed the middle bottom rim of the 22-foot-long compact dumpster was observed with a 6 inch by 4-inch buildup of gray sludge on the exterior side. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF583Aug 14, 2026

    Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to protect private health information for 32 of 147 residents (Resident #106, #143, #4, #82, #100, #130, #137, #56, #103, #124, #29, #17, #123, #18, #99, #77, #41, #116, #134, #73, #147, #35, #126, #115, #145, #27, #23, #132, #50, #111, #16, and #34), when staff left confidential medical information in a clear cylinder shaped plastic container, accessible to the public on an unattended medication cart in hall 300. The findings included: A continuous observation of an unattended medication cart on hall 300 was made on 8/11/26 at 9:31 AM to 9:45 AM. On top of the medication cart was a clear plastic cylinder shaped container which contained empty pill pouches from the previous medication pass. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF689Aug 14, 2026

    Based on record review, observations, staff, resident, and plumber interviews, the facility failed to maintain safe hot water temperatures to avoid putting residents at risk (Residents #12, #131, #102, #21, #29, and #78). The facility also failed to remove fall mats from the bedside when residents (Resident #11, #110, and #85) were out of bed creating the potential for a preventable accident. These deficient practices affected 9 of 11 residents reviewed for accident/hazards. The findings included:a. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF914Aug 14, 2026

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide privacy curtains wide enough for visual privacy to protect a resident from view of others during activities of daily living. The deficient practice affected 4 of 12 residents reviewed for privacy curtain. (Resident #42, Resident #51, Resident # 62, and Resident #69) The findings included:1.Resident #42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #42 had severe cognitive impairment.On 8/12/26 at 9:56 AM an observation was conducted of urinary catheter care for Resident #42. Resident # 42's bed was closest to the door of the room. Nurse #5 went to pull the privacy curtain for Resident #42, and the privacy curtain did not go completely around Bed A. […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 77 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 14, 2026Standard6 findings
  • May 8, 2025Standard3 findings
  • Apr 18, 2024Standard10 findings
  • Jan 12, 2023Standard and complaint5 findings · 1 harm
  • Feb 4, 2022Standard and complaint5 findings
  • Mar 4, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 21, 2019Standard5 findings
  • Nov 8, 2018Standard4 findings
Show the 9 earlier surveys
  • Oct 27, 2016Standard3 findings
  • Nov 5, 2015Standard1 finding
  • Dec 4, 2014Standard4 findings
  • Oct 18, 2012—5 findings
  • Aug 25, 2011—8 findings
  • Feb 23, 2011—5 findings · 2 harm
  • Nov 18, 2010—3 findings
  • Sep 9, 2010—1 finding
  • May 20, 2010—8 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction