Deficiency Index

Autumn Lake Healthcare at Chesapeake Woods

Cambridge, Maryland · CCN 215221

16 surveys since 2011, 5 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
100
Surveys
16
Harm or worse
5
Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
1
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file13/16

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
98
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
AUTUMN LAKE HEALTHCARE
County
Dorchester · rural
Medicare-certified since
1990

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
3
Staffing
4
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 31 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Maryland.

Last survey on record

Dec 19, 2025

325 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.983.57
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.71—
Annual nurse turnover39.0%44.4%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$50,879 across 2 penalties

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ12.0%K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD4081.6%E510.2%F36.1%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 49 of the 100 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6103×

    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F5842×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

  • F6412×

    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Autumn Lake Healthcare at Chesapeake Woods, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Dec 19, 2025

    Based on record review and interviews it was determined that the facility staff failed to supervise a cognately impaired resident who was at high risk for elopement as evidenced by the resident leaving the facility unattended without the staff's knowledge. This deficient practice was evidenced in 1(#40) of 1 resident investigations reviewed for elopement during the recertification survey.The BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) assessment is a quick standardized cognitive screening tool used in long-term care facilities to gauge a resident's orientation, attention and memory recall through simple questions about the date and repeating three words. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF697Dec 2, 2021

    Based on the review of a medical record, the review of pertinent facility documentation, and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to initiate pain management as ordered. This was evident for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #5) reviewed for fractures during a complaint survey. The findings include: On 12/1/2021 at 1:00 PM a review of the facility's investigation related to an injury of unknown origin for Resident #5 revealed that on 8/30/2021 at 12:00 AM, a geriatric nursing assistant (GNA), Staff # 12 reported to the night shift nurse, LPN # 11, that Resident #5 vomited a large amount of brown liquid. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Dec 19, 2025

    Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on observations, record review, and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain food service equipment in a manner that ensures sanitary food service operations to prevent possible foodborne illness. This was evident during the initial tour of the kitchen.The findings include:Cross-contamination refers to the transference of harmful substances or pathogenic microorganisms to food by hands, food contact surfaces, sponges, cloth towels, or utensils that have not been properly cleaned after contacting raw food and then touching ready-to-eat foods. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF923Dec 19, 2025

    Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on observations and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain clean and effective ventilation systems, thereby impeding proper airflow throughout the premises. This was evident in 13 out of 16 ventilation systems reviewed during the annual survey.The findings include:Local Exhaust Ventilation ([NAME]) systems are designed/engineered to capture and remove contaminants such as excessive heat, steam, condensation, vapor, smoke, and fumes. This is achieved by calibrating the total pressure, which is determined by the sum of the static pressure exiting and entering the system, minus the velocity pressure entering the system. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF558Dec 19, 2025

    Based on observations and interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure residents had access to their calls bells if assistance was needed. This deficient practice was evidenced in 7 (#10, #28, #44, #59, #72, #83, & #85) out of 36 residents who resided on Choptank during the recertification survey.The findings include:On 12/10/25 at 7:44 am during observation rounds the surveyor observed multiple residents on the unit Choptank who did not have access to their call bells. At 7:46 am the surveyor observed Resident # 44 call bell on top of the fall mat next to the bed. At 7:53 am the surveyor observed Resident #85 & Resident #28 call bells on the floor. At 7:55 am the surveyor observed Resident #10 call bell hanging off the side of the bed. […]

Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 100 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Dec 19, 2025Standard and complaint17 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 5, 2024Standard and complaint17 findings
  • Dec 2, 2021Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 24, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Mar 29, 2019Standard and complaint17 findings
  • Nov 13, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 23, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 3, 2017Standard8 findings
Show the 8 earlier surveys
  • Sep 23, 2016Standard and complaint3 findings
  • Jul 17, 2015Standard and complaint15 findings
  • Dec 8, 2014Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 11, 2014Standard6 findings
  • Apr 8, 2013—2 findings
  • Jan 31, 2012—4 findings · 2 harm
  • May 19, 2011—1 finding · 1 harm
  • Mar 24, 2011—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction