Woodside Rehab & Nursing
Silver Spring, Maryland · CCN 215060
31 surveys since 2011, 3 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 186
- Surveys
- 31
- Harm or worse
- 3
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 92
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- REGENCY CARE
- County
- Montgomery
- Medicare-certified since
- 1968
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 31 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Maryland.
Last survey on record
Jun 1, 2026
161 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G11.8% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D4683.6% | E23.6% | F11.8% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B35.5% | C23.6% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6563×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F6573×
Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
- F8423×
Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
- F5802×
Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
- F6092×
Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Woodside Rehab & Nursing, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF684Mar 11, 2026
Based on the complaint, medical record review, reviews of all pertinent records from a local hospital and emergency services provider, interviews with current staff, and an interview with the resident's attending physician, it was determined that the facility failed to 1) honor a resident's end of life wishes. This caused harm to Resident #2. The facility also failed to follow the physician's specific pulse and blood pressure parameters before administering a cardiac medications. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Apr 17, 2025
Based on observation and interviews with facility staff, it was determined the facility failed to: 1) Remove outdated nourishment from the refrigerator, 2) ensure a sanitary environment in cleaning food items, and 3) ensure the labeling, dating, and expiration of food items. This was found to be evident during the facility's recertification/complaint Medicare/Medicaid survey and has the potential to affect all residents who consume food prepared in the facility's kitchen. The findings include: During the initial tour of the kitchen conducted on 04/09/2025 08:08 AM, a quarter jar of yellow mustard with open date of 12/05/2024 was seen in the refrigerator. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF628Jun 1, 2026
Based on observations, record review and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure: 1) appropriate resident information was sent to the receiving facility and 2) a resident's bed hold policy was maintained and care planned in accordance with facility policy and resident rights requirements, placing the resident at risk for misunderstanding bed hold procedures and return to facility expectations following hospitalization. This was evident for 3 (Resident #17, #6 and #77) out of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalizations. The findings include: 1. On 05/27/2026 at 11:15 AM, during unit rounding, the surveyor observed Staff #5 preparing Resident #17 to be transferred to the hospital. On 05/27/2026 at 11:55 AM, an interview with Staff #5 was conducted. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF641Jun 1, 2026
Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility to code the residents' status accurately on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. This was evident for 3 (Resident #10, #72 and #8) out of 4 reviewed for accuracy of assessment during the recertification survey. The findings include: 1. On 05/27/2026 at 9:38 AM, a review of Resident #10's medical records was conducted. The review revealed that the resident had an active order for Lovenox 30 mg at bedtime. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF656Jun 1, 2026
Based on observation, record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that comprehensive care plans were developed and implemented. This was found to be evident for one (Resident #9) out of eighteen residents reviewed during an annual survey.The findings include: During screening on 5/26/26 at 8:43 AM, the surveyor noted that Resident #9 had an indwelling foley bag that was covered with a dignity bag. A review of Resident #9's electronic medical record (EMR) on 5/26/26 at 12:15 PM revealed that Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to, prostate cancer with metastases to the bone. Further review disclosed an order for an indwelling catheter for obstructive uropathy was written on 4/18/26 by MD#27 (Medical Director). […]
Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 186 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jun 1, 2026Standard10 findings
- Mar 11, 2026Complaint7 findings · 1 harm
- Apr 17, 2025Standard and complaint24 findings
- Feb 26, 2021Standard2 findings
- Oct 23, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Feb 6, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Jun 18, 2019Standard and complaint15 findings
- Mar 6, 2019Complaint3 findings
Show the 23 earlier surveys
- Feb 5, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Sep 27, 2018Complaint3 findings
- Apr 16, 2018Standard and complaint25 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 16, 2017Complaint2 findings
- May 31, 2017Standard and complaint11 findings
- Dec 19, 2016Complaint3 findings
- Nov 22, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Aug 3, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Apr 28, 2016Standard7 findings
- Feb 5, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Oct 21, 2015Complaint1 finding
- May 1, 2015Standard4 findings
- Jan 21, 2015Complaint1 finding
- May 15, 2014Standard and complaint5 findings
- Feb 21, 2014—1 finding
- Nov 8, 2013—1 finding
- Jun 3, 2013—18 findings
- Jun 28, 2012—8 findings
- Apr 10, 2012—1 finding
- Feb 27, 2012—5 findings · 1 harm
- Nov 14, 2011—2 findings
- May 4, 2011—14 findings
- Jan 10, 2011—5 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction