Autumn Lake Healthcare at Arlington West
Baltimore, Maryland · CCN 215349
23 surveys since 2010, 2 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 151
- Surveys
- 23
- Harm or worse
- 2
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 82
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- AUTUMN LAKE HEALTHCARE
- County
- Baltimore City
- Medicare-certified since
- 2005
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 31 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Maryland.
Last survey on record
Jul 6, 2026
126 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.61 | 3.57 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.39 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 43.8% | 44.4% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Abuse icon
- Flagged by CMS on Care Compare
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D3368.8% | E1122.9% | F12.1% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C36.3% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6002×
Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
- F6092×
Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
- F6102×
Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
- F6232×
Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
- F6252×
Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Autumn Lake Healthcare at Arlington West, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812May 6, 2022
Based on observation, interview, and documentation review it was determined that the facility staff failed to store, prepare, and maintain a sanitary environment in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by failing to ensure dishwasher hot water temperatures are frequently checked to ensure cleanliness and sanitation of dishware, failing to ensure safe refrigerator temperatures and failing to dispose of outdated food items. This practice had the potential to affect all residents that consumed food that was prepared by the kitchen. The findings include: 1) An initial environmental kitchen food services inspection was conducted on 4/19/22 at 8:46 AM. The dishwasher temperature log was found near the dishwasher hanging on a clipboard. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF550May 6, 2022
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide residents with dignity and respect by improperly transporting residents down the hall (Resident #70, Resident #173 Resident #21 and assisting a resident to eat (Resident #65). These events were evident during 5 random observations on the facility nursing units during the survey. The findings include: 1) During an observation of the 3rd-floor nursing unit on 04/20/2022 at 11:11 AM, therapy staff member #14 was observed pulling Resident #70 backwards in a wheelchair down the hallway towards the main dining area. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF610May 6, 2022
Based on interview and review of facility reported incident (FRI) investigation documentation it was determined the facility staff failed to thoroughly investigate incidents of alleged verbal and physical abuse. This was evident for 5 of 6 residents (Resident #9, #225, #226, #275, #276) reviewed for abuse. The findings include: 1) On 4/28/2022 at 2:00 PM, review of the facility reported incident MD 599 revealed that Resident #9 had alleged that GNA #33 slapped him/her. The facility administrative staff investigated and substantiated the allegation of physical abuse and terminated GNA #33. Resident #9's roommate was noted as not a reliable witness and was not interviewed. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF656May 6, 2022
Based on record reviews, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to: 1) develop and implement comprehensive person-centered care that were resident specific with measurable objectives and goals (Resident #26, #66, #57, #273) and 2) develop a care plan to address the use of an anticoagulant (Resident#58). This was evident for 5 out of 55 residents reviewed during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. The MDS is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument that was Federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF688May 6, 2022
Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to have a process to ensure that residents with a limited range of motion received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent further decline in range of motion. This was evident for 3 of 4 residents (Resident #21, #26, #66) reviewed for limited range of motion during the survey. The findings include. 1) Resident #21's medical record was reviewed on 4/20/22 at 1:15 PM. A physician's orders [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]
Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 151 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 6, 2026Complaint3 findings
- Jun 17, 2025Standard and complaint4 findings
- May 6, 2022Standard and complaint30 findings
- Jun 12, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Nov 1, 2018Standard and complaint13 findings
- Mar 27, 2018Complaint3 findings
- Jan 9, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Nov 9, 2017Complaint1 finding
Show the 15 earlier surveys
- Jul 27, 2017Standard and complaint8 findings
- Feb 23, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Sep 23, 2016Standard8 findings
- Oct 5, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Jul 24, 2015Standard5 findings
- May 22, 2014Standard and complaint23 findings
- Oct 17, 2013—3 findings
- May 17, 2013—9 findings
- Apr 15, 2013—2 findings
- Mar 18, 2013—5 findings
- Mar 13, 2013—4 findings
- Dec 13, 2012—2 findings · 2 harm
- Apr 12, 2012—16 findings
- Apr 12, 2011—7 findings
- Oct 27, 2010—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction