Deficiency Index

Complete Care at Annapolis

Annapolis, Maryland · CCN 215005

29 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2017.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
149
Surveys
29
Harm or worse
3
Immediate jeopardy
3
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy3

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file26/29

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
97
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
COMPLETE CARE
County
Anne Arundel
Medicare-certified since
1976

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
3
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 31 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Maryland.

Last survey on record

Mar 10, 2026

244 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.633.57
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.71—
Annual nurse turnover44.9%44.4%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2996.7%E13.3%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 30 of the 149 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6572×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

  • F6842×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F6952×

    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.

  • F5681×

    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.

  • F6091×

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Complete Care at Annapolis, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF578Apr 7, 2021

    Based on medical record review, the review of pertinent records from a local hospital and emergency services provider, interviews with current and former staff, and interview with residents' attending physician, it was determined that the facility failed to: 1.) Ensure the expressed wishes of Resident #1 were clearly communicated to emergency services personnel on [DATE], the day the resident became unresponsive and unable to communicate said wishes; and 2.) Ensure residents' expressed wishes for life sustaining treatment were obtained and documented in a manner that involved the resident or the resident's representative. This was evidence for 3 of 21 resident reviewed during the revisit survey (Residents #1, #3, and #14). […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Apr 7, 2021

    Based on facility investigation documentation and medical records; observations and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to have an effective system in place to prevent residents with cognitive impairment from leaving the facility without appropriate supervision. More specifically, the facility failed to 1) Provide adequate supervision to prevent a resident with known wandering and exit seeking behaviors from exiting the facility unsupervised on 7/19/20, 2) Provide adequate supervision to prevent the same resident from exiting the facility nine weeks later on 9/21/20, 3) Ensure all staff have been trained on how to check the functionality of the wander guard bracelets and how to obtain a new bracelet or replacement bracelet when necessary, 4) Educate all staff on the location… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF835Apr 7, 2021

    Based on review of medical records and other pertinent documentation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct oversight of their social worker regarding the use of presigned Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) forms. This failure allowed the facility's social worker to complete presigned MOLST forms without speaking with the resident, the resident's family, or the resident's physician regarding end of life wishes. This was evidence for 3 of 21 resident reviewed during the revisit survey (Residents #1, #3, and #14). The facility's action and lack of oversight placed residents at risk of suffering injury if cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was initiated by following Physician #27 and Social Worker #23 MOLST orders. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF842Apr 7, 2021

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to maintain a medical record in the most accurate form. This was evident for 5 of 25 residents reviewed in the complaint survey but affected all residents in the facility (Resident #12, #6 #9, #24, and #25). The findings include: 1) On [DATE] a review of Resident #12's medical record revealed the resident was discharged from the facility on [DATE]. On [DATE], eight (8) days after discharge a Coronavirus Pre-Assessment was completed on Resident #12 and recorded in the medical record. The assessment included Resident #12's temperature, taken on [DATE] at 7:36 AM, and recorded as 97.7 degrees. The inaccurate medical record assessment was confirmed with the Administrator on [DATE] at 1:11 PM. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF568Mar 10, 2026

    Based on record review, interview with residents, and the facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that quarterly resident fund account statements were provided to residents. This was evident for four residents (Residents #86, # 1, #3 and #47) out of five residents reviewed for personal funds during the facility's recertification survey.The findings include:On 03/06/2026 at 7:45 AM, during the initial tour of the facility, some residents provided statements regarding quarterly statement of account as follows.On 03/03/2026 at 9:09 AM, Resident #86 stated that he/she did not receive a quarterly statement.On 03/03/2026 at 9:42 AM, Resident#1 stated that he/she had an account with the facility but had never received statements and requested that statements be… […]

Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 149 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Mar 10, 2026Standard and complaint8 findings
  • Dec 11, 2024Standard and complaint8 findings
  • Apr 7, 2021Complaint15 findings · 2 harm
  • Nov 14, 2019Standard and complaint14 findings
  • Mar 25, 2019Complaint5 findings
  • Jan 24, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 14, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 5, 2018Complaint1 finding
Show the 21 earlier surveys
  • Jul 27, 2018Standard and complaint10 findings
  • Jul 2, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 20, 2017Complaint3 findings
  • Nov 20, 2017Complaint9 findings
  • Sep 20, 2017Complaint9 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 6, 2017Complaint8 findings
  • Jun 5, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 10, 2017Standard4 findings
  • May 20, 2016Standard11 findings
  • Apr 18, 2016Complaint10 findings
  • Jul 8, 2015Complaint5 findings
  • Mar 26, 2015Standard4 findings
  • Jun 16, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • May 12, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 22, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 14, 2014—2 findings
  • Jan 18, 2013—3 findings
  • Oct 28, 2011—4 findings
  • Apr 5, 2011—3 findings
  • Nov 15, 2010—2 findings
  • Oct 14, 2010—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction