Anoka Rehabilitation and Living Center
Anoka, Minnesota · CCN 245205
41 surveys since 2011, 7 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 145
- Surveys
- 41
- Harm or worse
- 7
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 120
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA SENIOR LIVING
- County
- Anoka
- Medicare-certified since
- 1976
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 18 not-for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Minnesota.
Last survey on record
Nov 13, 2025
361 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.11 | 4.27 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.19 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 36.8% | 33.8% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $24,297 across 1 penalty
- Payment denials
- 1
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G13.1% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2268.8% | E515.6% | F39.4% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C13.1% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8124×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F5502×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F6862×
Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
- F6892×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F8802×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Anoka Rehabilitation and Living Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Mar 26, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure comprehensive assessments were consistently completed, provide and implement interventions to prevent recurrent pressure ulcers (PU) for 1 of 1 residents (R13) who had a history of facility acquired stage 3 pressure ulcers. The facility's failures resulted in actual harm when R13 developed a recurrent pressure ulcer to the right heel. Findings include: R13's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including aphasia following intracranial hemorrhage (difficulty understanding or expressing speech following a brain bleed), morbid obesity, muscle weakness, heart failure, diabetes mellitus, non-Alzheimer's dementia, and arthritis. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Jan 12, 2023
Based on interview and document review the facility failed to perform root cause analysis to determine patterns for falls and failed to develop and implement person centered interventions to reduce the risk for falls for 1 of 3 residents (R5) reviewed for falls. This resulted in actual harm for R5 who fell and sustained a fractured finger and a laceration to her eye that required sutures and hospitalization to monitor for a concussion. Findings include: R5's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified moderate cognitive impairment and indicated she required extensive assistance for transfers and toileting, was always incontinent of bladder and always continent of bowel. The MDS indicated R5 had one fall since the prior assessment with no injury. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Jan 22, 2025
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) was worn to prevent the spread of infection for for 2 of 2 residents (R8, R9) observed for COVID-19 transmission based precautions (TBP) and for 1 of 2 residents (R10) observed for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP), (an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities). […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jul 18, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure food was properly stored, labeled, dated, and failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen to reduce and/or prevent the risk of food borne illness this practice had the potential to affect all 112 residents, staff and guests who consumed foods from the facility kitchen. Findings include: During initial kitchen tour on 7/15/24 at 11:26 a.m., with certified dietary manager (CDM) the following concerns were observed: - Three dietary staff were observed without hairnets as they placed plastic wrap over plates of cooked food. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812May 18, 2023
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure foods stored in the refrigerator were labeled and dated when opened. These failures had the potential to affect all 109 residents in the facility who consumed food from the kitchen. Findings include: Observation of the walk-in refrigerator on 05/15/23 at 11:00 a.m., with the Assistant Dietary Manger in the main first floor kitchen revealed the following: -an open bag of onions that had been tied closed but sliced open, lacked a label with contents and opened on date. -an open bag of cheese, lacked a label with opened on date or use by date. -bag of sliced cucumbers, lacked a label with opened on date or use by date. -an open bag of cube ham, lacked a label with contents, opened on date or use by date. […]
Read 27 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 27 of 145 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Nov 13, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Aug 21, 2025Standard3 findings
- Jan 22, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Dec 17, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Oct 3, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Jul 18, 2024Standard12 findings
- Apr 22, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Mar 26, 2024Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
Show the 33 earlier surveys
- May 18, 2023Standard7 findings
- Jan 12, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Sep 26, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Aug 10, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Jul 8, 2022Complaint3 findings
- Feb 17, 2022Standard6 findings
- Nov 5, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Oct 18, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Oct 7, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Jul 14, 2021Complaint2 findings
- Apr 15, 2021Complaint2 findings
- Apr 7, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Mar 25, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Feb 1, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Jan 4, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Jun 5, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Feb 20, 2020Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Dec 20, 2019Standard10 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 3, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Aug 30, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Feb 13, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Oct 25, 2018Standard3 findings
- Feb 23, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Nov 16, 2017Standard12 findings
- Oct 21, 2016Standard13 findings
- Dec 10, 2015Standard9 findings
- Oct 23, 2014Standard8 findings
- Mar 13, 2014Standard2 findings
- Nov 4, 2013—2 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 11, 2013—7 findings
- May 29, 2013—1 finding · 1 harm
- May 3, 2012—4 findings
- May 19, 2011—10 findings · 1 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction