Chapel View Health Care Center
Hopkins, Minnesota · CCN 245493
27 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2016.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 123
- Surveys
- 27
- Harm or worse
- 4
- Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
- 3
Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 100
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- CASSIA
- County
- Hennepin
- Medicare-certified since
- 1987
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 18 not-for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Minnesota.
Last survey on record
Apr 16, 2026
207 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.31 | 4.27 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.34 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 35.5% | 33.8% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $17,345 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L13.8% |
| Actual harm | G13.8% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1973.1% | E311.5% | F13.8% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C13.8% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8803×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F6842×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F6952×
Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
- F7002×
Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
- F7552×
Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Chapel View Health Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, widespreadF880Apr 24, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to implement infection control strategies for respiratory protection to mitigate the risk and spread of Influenza A. As a result, the facility developed an outbreak where 13 residents (R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R9, R13, R8, R10, R11 and R12) tested positive for Influenza A. Five residents (R1, R2, R5, R10 and R15) were sent to ED and admitted to hospital, These practices resulted in an immediate jeopardy (IJ) due to the likelihood of spread to the remaining 80 residents in the facility. The IJ began on 3/31/25, when the facility failed to implement ongoing monitoring, screening of residents with respiratory symptoms and implement transmission-based precautions and was identified on 4/18/25. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Aug 19, 2022
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate communication and monitoring of staff for safe transfers to 1 of 12 residents (R)-1 reviewed who required the use of assistive devices for transfers. The facilities failure resulted in harm when R1 suffered a fractured clavicle as a result of falling from a mechanical lift. The lift sling used was the incorrect size and R1 was assisted with only one staff member. The immediate jeopardy began on 8/15/22, when the facility failed to use the correct size sling and use the assistance of two staff members for a mechanical lift transfer and R1 fell to the floor fracturing her clavicle. The Administrator and the director of nursing (DON) were notified of the immediate jeopardy at 3:57 p.m. on 8/19/22. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF695Apr 16, 2026
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to follow practitioner orders for 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for respiratory care when R3 was sent to an off-site appointment without oxygen, resulting in a change in her condition requiring hospitalization.The noncompliance that began on 1/27/26 was corrected prior to the start of survey when the facility implemented a corrective action plan on 1/27/26. This is issued in past noncompliance. Findings include:R3's quarterly Minimum Data Set MDS), dated [DATE], indicated she had diagnoses of morbid obesity with alveolar hypoventilation (a condition where breathing is shallow or slow), hypertensive kidney disease, lymphedema (tissue swelling caused by fluid that is usually drained by the body's lymphatic system), atrial… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Oct 5, 2023
INFECTIOUS DISEASE SURVEILLANCE Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to implement an ongoing surveillance program for infectious disease tracking of new admissions that could affect all 90 residents and all staff at the facility, ensured hand hygiene and infection control was completed for 2 of 3 resident (R27 & R46) observed for incontinent cares and hand hygiene was completed during catheter cares to minimal risk of infection for 1of 1 residents (R27) reviewed for infection control practices. During an interview on 10/4/23 at 12:33 p.m., the facility infection preventionist (IP) stated the facility conducts infection surveillance for tracking and trending infections via spreadsheets. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Apr 7, 2022
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to have a method to consistently monitor dish machine temperatures to ensure proper sanitation of dishware. This had the potential for food-borne illness and could affect 92 of 93 residents who recieved meals prepared and served by the facility. Findings include: Review of the Food Code 2017 included, Adequate cleaning and sanitization of dishes and utensils using a ware-washing machine is directly dependent on the exposure time during the wash, rinse, and sanitizing cycles. Failure to meet manufacturer and Code requirements for cycle times could result in failure to clean and sanitize. For example, high temperature machines depend on the buildup of heat on the surface of dishes to accomplish sanitization. […]
Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 123 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Apr 16, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Dec 4, 2025Standard2 findings
- Apr 24, 2025Complaint7 findings · 1 harm
- Apr 2, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Nov 21, 2024Standard2 findings
- Jun 26, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Apr 18, 2024Complaint3 findings
- Oct 5, 2023Standard and complaint7 findings
Show the 19 earlier surveys
- Sep 19, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Jun 21, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Aug 19, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Apr 7, 2022Standard and complaint4 findings
- Oct 1, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Jan 31, 2019Standard4 findings
- Nov 16, 2017Standard9 findings
- Aug 1, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Jul 19, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Dec 8, 2016Standard12 findings
- Apr 29, 2016Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 15, 2015Standard2 findings
- Aug 19, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Dec 4, 2014Standard11 findings
- Nov 21, 2013—11 findings
- Jun 25, 2013—1 finding
- Feb 1, 2013—16 findings
- Mar 1, 2012—8 findings
- Apr 14, 2011—10 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction