Deficiency Index

Agawam North Rehab and Nursing

Agawam, Massachusetts · CCN 225766

22 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2016.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
92
Surveys
22
Harm or worse
9
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse9

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file18/22

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
124
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
STERN CONSULTANTS
County
Hampden
Medicare-certified since
2002

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
1
Staffing
3
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 80 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Massachusetts.

Last survey on record

Apr 9, 2025

579 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.653.64
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.65—
Annual nurse turnover44.5%40.7%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$86,130 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1657.1%E828.6%F13.6%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B27.1%C13.6%
CMS’s current file: 28 of the 92 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F7562×

    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.

  • F5501×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F5511×

    Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Agawam North Rehab and Nursing, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF580Apr 9, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the Physician/Nurse Practitioner (NP) timely of a change in condition for two Residents (#13 and #47) out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically: 1. For Resident #13, the facility staff failed to: -notify the Physician/NP timely when a right heel wound change in condition was identified resulting in delayed treatment and monitoring of the Resident, deterioration of the wound and hospitalization for infection and management of worsening wound condition. 2. For Resident #47, facility staff failed to: -obtain weight when the Resident was readmitted to the facility after a hospitalization . […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF580Apr 9, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the Physician/Nurse Practitioner (NP) timely of a change in condition for two Residents (#13 and #47) out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically: 1. For Resident #13, the facility staff failed to: -notify the Physician/NP timely when a right heel wound change in condition was identified resulting in delayed treatment and monitoring of the Resident, deterioration of the wound and hospitalization for infection and management of worsening wound condition. 2. For Resident #47, facility staff failed to: -obtain weight when the Resident was re-admitted to the facility after a hospitalization. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Apr 9, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent and treat a pressure ulcer (localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence or related to a medical or other device) and prevent further skin decline for one Resident (#13), of 5 applicable residents, out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, for Resident #13, the facility failed to: -appropriately and timely assess an identified scab of the right heel after a previous wound had healed, when the Resident was identified as being at high risk for developing pressure ulcers. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600May 3, 2022

    Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who required assist of one staff member for personal hygiene, transfers, and ambulation, and who was undergoing treatment for [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . - On 4/18/22 after being transferred to and evaluated in the Hospital Emergency Department for an acute change in his/her medical status, Resident #1 was medically cleared by the Hospital and transferred back to the Facility via Ambulance the same day. However, upon return to the Facility he/she was denied entry and was informed by staff that Administration said he/she was discharged . […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF626May 3, 2022

    Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who required emergent transfer to the Hospital Emergency Department (ED) on 04/18/22, for evaluation of an acute change in medical status, was medically cleared by the ED later that same day, and was returned to the Facility via ambulance, the Facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was permitted to return, and denied him/her re-entry. Resident #1 was not told why he/she was abruptly being discharged , said he/she had no where to go in the community to live, was quite upset of the situation, and subsequently required transfer back to the Hospital. […]

Read 26 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 26 of 92 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 9, 2026Standard4 findings
  • Apr 9, 2025Standard19 findings · 3 harm
  • Oct 22, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 23, 2024Standard7 findings
  • Jul 26, 2022Standard4 findings
  • May 3, 2022Complaint5 findings · 2 harm
  • Apr 27, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Apr 20, 2021Complaint1 finding
Show the 14 earlier surveys
  • Jan 28, 2021Infection control1 finding
  • Jul 1, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Mar 6, 2020Standard10 findings
  • Mar 26, 2019Standard9 findings
  • Sep 5, 2018Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Dec 27, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 16, 2017Standard1 finding
  • Dec 2, 2016Standard4 findings
  • Jan 26, 2016Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 1, 2015Standard3 findings
  • Aug 13, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 19, 2014Standard2 findings
  • Jun 26, 2012—4 findings
  • Jun 1, 2011—9 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction