Based on interview, observation, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure that one of one sampled resident (3) who received dialysis (a treatment for kidney failure that removes waste and excess fluid from the blood), received services consistent with professional standards of practice by not having documented the resident's care needs and not having provided documented evidence that the resident was monitored for complications or significant changes in clinical status, including bleeding and hypotension (low blood pressure).Findings include:1. Interview on 8/12/25 at 9:16 a.m. …
F698 citations in South Dakota
Dialysis · Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies
Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
Against expectation — 2025
South Dakota cites F698 less often than its own record predicts
0.22 times the national share — cited less often here than elsewhere.
Of every deficiency written in South Dakota in 2025, this is the portion that was F698.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What South Dakota surveyors wrote
F698 findings written in South Dakota, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
The short window
Recent years
| Year | Share of South Dakota citations | vs expected |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 0.36% | 0.45× |
| 2024 | 0.67% | 0.89× |
| 2025 | 0.17% | 0.22× |
Shares of citations, not counts: earlier years hold fewer inspections.
What else South Dakota surveyors cite →
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction