F698 in New Hampshire. Pick another state for the same tag.
Against expectation — 2025
New Hampshire cites F698 less often than its own record predicts
Versus expected share0.96×
0.96 times the national share — cited less often here than elsewhere.
Share of New Hampshire citations0.72%
Of every deficiency written in New Hampshire in 2025, this is the portion that was F698.
New Hampshire0.72%
National0.75%
Share of all citations that were F698.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What New Hampshire surveyors wrote
F698 findings written in New Hampshire, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
D · No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedSeptember 18, 2025
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents received scheduled medications on days that they attended dialysis for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dialysis in a final sample of 28 residents (Resident Identifier is #6).Findings include: Interview on 9/16/25 at approximately 1:41 p.m. with Resident #6 revealed that he/she attended dialysis on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays for a diagnosis of Stage 5 Kidney Disease. Interview on 9/17/25 at approximately 2:00 p.m. with Staff B (Medication Nursing Assistant) revealed that Doxazosin medication was not given on days of dialysis. …
B · No harm, potential for minimal, patternJuly 15, 2022
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident who attends [CONDITION(S)] receives the appropriate monitoring of his/her [CONDITION(S)] access cite for 1 out of 1 residents reviewed for [CONDITION(S)] in a final sample of 30 residents. (Resident Identifier is #110.)
Findings include:
Review on 7/14/22 of Resident #110's medical record revealed that he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and he/she goes to [CONDITION(S)] 3 times a week.
Review on 7/14/22 of Resident #110's physicians orders revealed there was not an order for [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] .
Review on 7/15/22 of Resident #110's care plan for [CONDITION(S)] revealed that there was no mention of Resident #110's access site. …
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction