Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received medications scheduled during dialysis times for 1 of 1 resident (Resident (R)1) reviewed for dialysis out of sample of 31 residents. This failure had the potential to result in ineffective treatment of the resident's medical conditions, uncontrolled phosphorus levels, unmanaged pain, and adverse health outcomes associated with repeated omission of physician-ordered medications. Findings include: The facility reported they had no policy regarding medications provided on dialysis days. Review of R1's Face Sheet, located in the Face Sheet tab of the EMR, revealed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis including but not limited to end stage renal disease (ESRD). …
F698 citations in South Carolina
Dialysis · Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies
Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
Against expectation — 2025
South Carolina cites F698 more often than its own record predicts
1.07 times the share F698 takes of citations nationally.
Of every deficiency written in South Carolina in 2025, this is the portion that was F698.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What South Carolina surveyors wrote
F698 findings written in South Carolina, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
The short window
Recent years
| Year | Share of South Carolina citations | vs expected |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 0.47% | 0.58× |
| 2024 | 1.29% | 1.70× |
| 2025 | 0.80% | 1.07× |
Shares of citations, not counts: earlier years hold fewer inspections.
What else South Carolina surveyors cite →
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction