Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a discharge summary that contains all the necessary elements for 1 out of 1 residents reviewed for discharge (Resident Identifier is #62). Findings include: Review on 12/15/23 of Resident #62's nursing note dated 10/2/23 revealed Was informed this am that this resident is going back to his room on the AL [Assisted Living] floor, the Inn. Resident was sent to the ER [emergency room ] due to gross hematuria in his Foley bag. Resident was treated for UTI [urinary tract infection] with Cipro. Last dose given on 10/01 in the PM. Hematuria resolved and he was started back on his Eliquis with no further bleeding. …
F661 citations in New Hampshire
Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies
Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
Against expectation — 2023
New Hampshire cites F661 more often than its own record predicts
3.17 times the share F661 takes of citations nationally.
Of every deficiency written in New Hampshire in 2023, this is the portion that was F661.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What New Hampshire surveyors wrote
F661 findings written in New Hampshire, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
What else New Hampshire surveyors cite →
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction