Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the discharge summary was complete for two (#7 and #8) of three residents reviewed for discharge out of 14 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure completed discharge summaries were completed and included a recapitulation of the resident's stay for Resident #7 and Resident #8. Findings include: I. Resident #7 A. Resident status Resident #7, age 80, was admitted on [DATE] and discharged home on 8/21/24 According to the August 2024 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included bilateral hip osteoarthritis and bilateral total hip replacement. …
F661 citations in Colorado
Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies
Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
Against expectation — 2024
Colorado cites F661 more often than its own record predicts
1.31 times the share F661 takes of citations nationally.
Of every deficiency written in Colorado in 2024, this is the portion that was F661.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Colorado surveyors wrote
F661 findings written in Colorado, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
The short window
Recent years
| Year | Share of Colorado citations | vs expected |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 0.25% | 0.98× |
| 2024 | 0.30% | 1.31× |
Shares of citations, not counts: earlier years hold fewer inspections.
What else Colorado surveyors cite →
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction