Based on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure a discharge summary was completed for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 2). The deficient practice had the potential for the facility failing to provide the necessary information to continuing care providers pertaining to the course of treatment while the resident was at the facility and the resident's plan of care after discharge. Findings include: Resident 2 (R2) R2 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 03/31/2025 with diagnoses including Friedreich ataxia, unspecified symptoms and signs involving cognitive functions and awareness, and functional quadriplegia. …
F661 citations in Nevada
Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies
Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
Against expectation — 2025
Nevada cites F661 more often than its own record predicts
2.57 times the share F661 takes of citations nationally.
Of every deficiency written in Nevada in 2025, this is the portion that was F661.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Nevada surveyors wrote
F661 findings written in Nevada, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
The short window
Recent years
| Year | Share of Nevada citations | vs expected |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 0.56% | 2.15× |
| 2024 | 0.13% | 0.56× |
| 2025 | 0.16% | 2.57× |
Shares of citations, not counts: earlier years hold fewer inspections.
What else Nevada surveyors cite →
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction