F586 in Minnesota. Pick another state for the same tag.
Against expectation — 2024
Minnesota cites F586 more often than its own record predicts
Versus expected share7.99×
7.99 times the share F586 takes of citations nationally.
Share of Minnesota citations0.04%
Of every deficiency written in Minnesota in 2024, this is the portion that was F586.
Minnesota0.04%
National0.00%
Share of all citations that were F586.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Minnesota surveyors wrote
F586 findings written in Minnesota, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
D · No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedNovember 18, 2024
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 resident (R18) was provided communication with the county care coordinator (CC) and those communications were not discouraged or obstructed, when multiple attempts were made to contact R18 without success.
Findings include:
Review of a 5/20/24, State Agency (SA) report identified on 5/26/24 the care coordinator (CC) for R18 had telephoned the facility and spoke with an unidentified charge nurse leaving contact information for R18 to return the call. The social services designee (SSD) then emailed CC that R18 had attempted to return her call, but she was on another line. …
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction