Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
F578 in Wisconsin. Pick another state for the same tag.
Against expectation — 2025
Wisconsin cites F578 less often than its own record predicts
Versus expected share0.69×
0.69 times the national share — cited less often here than elsewhere.
Share of Wisconsin citations0.66%
Of every deficiency written in Wisconsin in 2025, this is the portion that was F578.
Wisconsin0.66%
National0.95%
Share of all citations that were F578.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Wisconsin surveyors wrote
F578 findings written in Wisconsin, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
L · Immediate jeopardy, widespreadJuly 24, 2026
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff verified and honored a resident's advance directive of Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) during a medical emergency before initiating cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and other resuscitative measures for one resident (R1) of six residents reviewed for code status.
R1 had a valid Emergency Care Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order signed by the resident on [DATE] and by the attending physician on [DATE] and entered into resident's record by the facility on R1's readmission on [DATE]. On [DATE], R1 went unresponsive with a faint pulse. Facility staff did not check R1's advance directives before performing Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) chest compressions on R1. …
Based on record review and staff interviews the facility did not always ensure that they had a system in place to ensure a residents advance directives were maintained and accurately documented in the resident's medical record for 2 of 13 sampled residents (R94 & R14)
R94's wishes were to be a Do Not Resuscitate code status. R94 experienced a significant decline in condition and was being transported by Emergency Medical Staff to the hospital. The EMS staff did not have the necessary advanced directive paper work for R94 and CPR was provided against R94's wishes. …
E · No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternJune 24, 2026
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that the Advanced Directives information related to resuscitation status was clearly identified on residents' medical records to ensure their life-sustaining wishes would be honored. This occurred for 9 of 18 sampled residents (R) reviewed for Advanced Directives. (R31, R5, R9, R7, R2, R59, R4, R30, and R32) R31's physician order noted code status of Do Not Resuscitate (DNR)/Do Not Intubate (DNI). R31's advance directive did not include R31's wishes for resuscitation, no DNR/DNI form was signed by R31 or R31's representative, and no documentation in R31's medical record regarding conversation with R31 regarding code status. R5's physician order noted code status of Do Not Resuscitate (DNR)/Do Not Intubate (DNI). …
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction