Deficiency Index

F578 citations in Vermont

Advance directives · Resident Rights Deficiencies

Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

F578 in Vermont. Pick another state for the same tag.

Against expectation — 2025

Vermont cites F578 less often than its own record predicts

Versus expected share0.68×

0.68 times the national share — cited less often here than elsewhere.

Share of Vermont citations0.64%

Of every deficiency written in Vermont in 2025, this is the portion that was F578.

Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.

In the surveyor’s words

What Vermont surveyors wrote

F578 findings written in Vermont, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.

Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.

J · Immediate jeopardy, isolatedSeptember 22, 2021

Based upon observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment was implemented, as indicated in a Do Not Resuscitate [DNR] order, for 1 resident [Res. #37] of 31 residents with DNR orders. This citation is at the immediate jeopardy level due to significant risk of serious harm as a result of the noncompliance to this resident and the 30 other residents with DNR orders. Findings include: A review of Res. #37's medical record reveals the resident has complex medical issues and diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . An interview was conducted with Res. #37 on [DATE] at 4:19 PM. The resident reported that on [DATE] his/her heart stopped and s/he had stopped breathing. …

Premier Rehab and Healthcare at Burlington

D · No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedMay 20, 2026

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's medical record clearly communicated the resident's code status for 1 of 17 sampled residents (Resident #4). Findings include:Per record review, Resident #4 did not have a COLST (Clinician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment). The resident's profile page in the Electronic Health Record (EHR) stated Resident #4 was a full code. Resident #4 has a care plan intervention dated 2/26/26 that stated the resident was a DNR/DNI (Do not resuscitate/Do not intubate) and that care limiting orders were in place if the resident were to be found unconscious, without a pulse, or not breathing. Additionally, there was no code status order. …

Greensboro Nursing Home

The short window

Recent years

YearShare of Vermont citationsvs expected
20241.27%1.29×
20250.64%0.68×

Shares of citations, not counts: earlier years hold fewer inspections.

What else Vermont surveyors cite →

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction