F561 in Florida. Pick another state for the same tag.
Against expectation — 2025
Florida cites F561 more often than its own record predicts
Versus expected share1.45×
1.45 times the share F561 takes of citations nationally.
Share of Florida citations0.56%
Of every deficiency written in Florida in 2025, this is the portion that was F561.
Florida0.56%
National0.38%
Share of all citations that were F561.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Florida surveyors wrote
F561 findings written in Florida, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
G · Actual harm, isolatedApril 2, 2026
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to promote and facilitate one (1) of one (1) resident's choice to close the room door at night for privacy and personal comfort (Resident #39); and two (2) of two (2) residents right to use electric wheelchairs to support mobility, independence, and the resident's highest practicable level of functioning (Resident #s 44 and 96). This failure caused Resident #44 frustration, anxiety, mental anguish, and self-isolation, which resulted in psychological harm.The findings include:1. …
D · No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedJuly 30, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 4 residents reviewed for Choices received requested on-site hair salon services, of a total sample of 44 residents, (#104).Findings:Review of the medical record revealed resident #104, a [AGE] year-old female was admitted to the facility from an acute care hospital on 4/25/24. The resident's active diagnoses included moderate bipolar disorder, undifferentiated schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, mood disorder, and seborrheic dermatitis (itchy/flaky dandruff).The most recent Annual Minimum Data Set Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date of 5/06/25 indicated resident #104 was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 out of 15, and her Functional Activities for… …
B · No harm, potential for minimal, patternJanuary 6, 2020
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a choice of health care providers for 3 of 3 sampled residents who received services from an eye doctor at the facility (Residents #1, #2 and #6). The facility changed from an individual eye doctor (Doctor A) who had been providing services to 86 residents at the facility, to another group of eye doctors (Doctor B), without informing any of the residents or resident representatives of the change. The facility also failed to keep 2 of 15 physicians, who provide services at the facility, up to date (Doctor C and D). …
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction