Woodbine Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center
Alexandria, Virginia · CCN 495019
14 surveys since 2010, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 86
- Surveys
- 14
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 307
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES
- County
- Alexandria City
- Medicare-certified since
- 1967
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 73 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Virginia.
Last survey on record
May 5, 2023
1,284 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.08 | 3.34 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.94 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 29.7% | 50.4% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1575.0% | E525.0% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6842×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F7562×
Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
- F5611×
Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
- F5781×
Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
- F5801×
Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Woodbine Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF584Feb 24, 2022
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure a clean environment for 3 of 40 residents in the survey sample (Resident #8, #62, and #143) whose rooms had a dried, light brown substance visible on multiple surfaces in their rooms. For Resident #8, #62, and #143, a dried, light brown substance was visible on multiple surfaces in their rooms. The findings included: 1. Resident #8's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Muscle Wasting and Atrophy, [CONDITION(S)], Essential Hypertension, [CONDITION(S)], Persistent Vegetative State, Protein-Calorie Malnutrition, [CONDITION(S)], Acute Kidney Failure, and Unstageable Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF684Feb 24, 2022
Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to follow physician's orders for 6 of 40 residents in the survey sample, Residents #8, #92, #143, #180, and #275 . For Resident #8, the facility staff failed to monitor blood pressure prior to the administration of [MEDICATION(S)], a medication used to increase blood pressure, on 42 separate occasions. The resident's [MEDICATION(S)] was not administered on two (2) separate occasions without a documented reason. For Resident #92, the facility staff failed to monitor blood pressure and/or heart rate prior to the administration of [MEDICATION(S)], a medication used to treat high blood pressure and prevent chest pain, on 15 separate occasions. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF760Feb 24, 2022
Based on staff interview and clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensure 5 out of 40 residents were free of significant medication errors, Resident #249, Resident #380, Resident #8, Resident #92 adn #275. For Resident #249, the facility staff held the resident's blood pressure medication, [MEDICATION(S)], when it should have been administered, and failed to obtain blood pressure prior to administering the blood pressure medication [MEDICATION(S)]. For Resident #380, the facility staff administered the resident's blood pressure medication, [MEDICATION(S)], when it should have been held, on three separate occasion. For Resident #8, the facility staff failed to follow physician's orders [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF842Feb 24, 2022
Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure a complete and accurate clinical record for 8 of 40 residents, Resident #279, #214, #236, #260, #62, #92, #143 and #180. For Resident #279, the nurse practitioner documented the resident expired in the ED (emergency department). When in fact the resident was pronounced and expired at the nursing facility. Resident #214 and Resident #236's clinical documentation failed to include evidence of the collection of laboratory samples for a C. auris test and for a CRE test. Resident #214's clinical documentation failed to include laboratory results for the C. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Feb 24, 2022
Based on observations, interviews, facility document review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to implement infection control and prevention program processes, including actions to decrease the risks of transmission of COVID-19 and/or other infectious organisms, for three (3) of 40 residents (Resident #135, Resident #162, and Resident #226. The facility staff failed to ensure a staff member completed COVID-19 screening prior to starting their work shift. For Resident #135, the facility staff failed to implement facility COVID-19 quarantine processes for a readmitted resident who had not yet received the COVID-19 booster. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 86 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- May 5, 2023Standard and complaint2 findings
- Feb 24, 2022Standard and complaint17 findings
- Apr 23, 2021Standard1 finding
- Nov 21, 2019Standard1 finding
- Sep 27, 2018Standard11 findings
- Jun 22, 2017Standard7 findings
- Jul 21, 2016Standard9 findings
- Aug 5, 2015Standard11 findings
Show the 6 earlier surveys
- Aug 20, 2014Standard3 findings
- Jul 25, 2013—2 findings
- Sep 20, 2012—4 findings
- Feb 15, 2012—4 findings
- Aug 11, 2011—13 findings
- Sep 16, 2010—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction