Wisconsin Dells Health Services
Wisconsin Dells, Wisconsin · CCN 525391
38 surveys since 2011, 8 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 125
- Surveys
- 38
- Harm or worse
- 8
- Immediate jeopardy
- 3
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 90
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- NORTH SHORE HEALTHCARE
- County
- Columbia
- Medicare-certified since
- 1985
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 51 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Wisconsin.
Last survey on record
Apr 30, 2026
193 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.44 | 3.71 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.94 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 37.5% | 44.4% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1571.4% | E14.8% | F523.8% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6893×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F8123×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F8802×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F5781×
Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
- F5851×
Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Wisconsin Dells Health Services, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF600Feb 23, 2022
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that each resident was free from abuse, including for 1 of 5 sampled residents (R1) this interaction resulted in psychosocial harm as evidenced by R1 changing her social patterns. This interaction had the potential to affect 4 of 5 residents who overheard the altercation (R2, R3, R4, R5). R1 changed her social habits when she no longer ate her meals in the dining room due to DA C (Dietary Aide) yelling and swearing at/or in front of her, taking her plate of food away, and telling her to get out of the dining room. R2, R3, R4 and R5 witnessed DA C yelling and swearing at R1 in the dining room; the facility failed to monitor these residents for emotional distress after the incident. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF925Aug 7, 2025
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to have an effective pest control program in place to prevent pests and rodents from entering the building through damaged exterior doors which lead into the kitchen. This has the potential to affect the census of 52. Findings include:During an initial inspection of the kitchen, on 08/06/25 at 1:20 PM, the following concerns were observed:1.There were two small black droppings in the dry storage room which appeared to be mouse droppings.2.The exterior door next to the dry storage area was observed to have gaps at the bottom of the door where light from outside was observed providing access to pests and/or rodents. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Mar 11, 2025
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not maintain a safe and sanitary environment in which food is prepared, stored and distributed. This has the potential to affect all 44 residents who reside in the facility. Surveyor observed the facility's freezer to have frozen condensation attached to the ceiling and fallen pieces of frozen condensation on top of and inside of boxes of unsealed food causing potential for contamination. Surveyor observed a mixer to be stored covered and unclean. Supplements in the medication rooms were not dated. Evidenced by: Example 1 Facility policy, titled Food Storage: Cold Foods, undated, includes: . All . […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Mar 11, 2025
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection, this has the potential to affect the census (44), 1 of 4 residents (R10) wound care observations with hand hygiene concerns, and 1 of 3 residents (R37) medication pass observations with hand hygiene concerns. The facility is not monitoring the temperature of 2 of their 3 water heaters as part of their control measures for Water Management Program. The facilities Policy and Procedure for Pneumococcal Vaccine is not up to date. The facility did not identify an outbreak on the date it started. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Apr 17, 2024
Based on observation, interview, document review, and review of the United States (US) Food Code, Dietary Aide (DA) J failed to test a low temperature dish machine's final rinse chemical level properly. In addition, two drink items were not labeled and located in the dietary reach-in refrigerator. The deficient practice affected 46 out of 48 residents and could cause the potential spread of foodborne illness. Findings include: Review of the US Food Code 2022 indicated, .Explaining correct procedures for cleaning and sanitizing utensils and food-contact surfaces of equipment. Employees are properly sanitizing cleaned multiuse equipment and utensils before they are reused. Review of the US Food Code 2022 indicated, . […]
Read 28 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 28 of 125 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Apr 30, 2026Standard3 findings
- Aug 7, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Mar 11, 2025Standard and complaint8 findings
- Sep 3, 2024Complaint1 finding
- May 21, 2024Complaint3 findings
- Apr 17, 2024Standard4 findings
- Feb 27, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Feb 2, 2023Standard6 findings
Show the 30 earlier surveys
- Feb 23, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Oct 27, 2021Standard and complaint8 findings
- May 4, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Dec 16, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Sep 29, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Jul 2, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Nov 14, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Oct 17, 2019Standard3 findings
- Aug 8, 2018Standard3 findings
- Jan 23, 2018Complaint2 findings
- Aug 2, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Jun 5, 2017Standard and complaint9 findings · 2 harm
- Dec 20, 2016Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- May 10, 2016Standard3 findings
- Feb 18, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Oct 22, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Sep 15, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Mar 19, 2015Standard and complaint18 findings · 2 harm
- Jan 27, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Dec 30, 2014Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
- Dec 2, 2014Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Feb 11, 2014—10 findings
- Jan 24, 2013—1 finding
- Dec 5, 2012—9 findings
- Aug 14, 2012—1 finding
- Jun 26, 2012—1 finding
- Sep 27, 2011—3 findings
- May 10, 2011—1 finding
- Mar 10, 2011—2 findings
- Feb 9, 2011—2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction