Deficiency Index

Kinnic Health and Rehabilitation Center

River Falls, Wisconsin · CCN 525513

22 surveys since 2011, 4 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
119
Surveys
22
Harm or worse
4
Immediate jeopardy
2
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file16/22

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
68
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
Independent
County
St. Croix
Medicare-certified since
1993

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
4
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 51 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Wisconsin.

Last survey on record

Jun 30, 2025

497 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.823.71
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.96—
Annual nurse turnover36.8%44.4%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1770.8%E14.2%F520.8%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C14.2%
CMS’s current file: 24 of the 119 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6232×

    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.

  • F8122×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F8802×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F5551×

    Honor the resident's right to choose his or her attending physician.

  • F5821×

    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Kinnic Health and Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF727Jun 30, 2025

    Based on interviews, the facility did not ensure full time Director of Nursing (DON) coverage. This has the potential to affect all 48 residents. Former DON C resigned effective 06/17/25. The facility did not have a full time DON from 6/17 - 6/30/25. This is evidenced by: On 06/30/25 at 8:15 AM, Surveyors entered the facility and requested to meet with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) A or DON B. Social Worker Assistant (SWA) D stated DON B works part-time Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday and the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) E is on vacation. On 06/30/25 at 4:05 PM, Surveyor interviewed NHA A asking about a full-time 40 hour a week DON. NHA A stated DON C left on 06/17/25 with no advance notice and DON B was initially hired to start in August in full-time status. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF730Jun 11, 2025

    Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility did not ensure Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) received a performance review every 12 months for three of three CNAs reviewed (CNA C, CNA D, CNA P). The facility failed to have a system in place to ensure that performance reviews were being done for any of the facility CNAs. This had the potential to affect all 49 residents residing in the facility. This is evidenced by: On 06/10/25, a sample of CNAs employed by the facility was selected for review for the completion of annual performance reviews. The facility provided the following information: CNA C has been employed at the facility since 12/15/20. An annual performance review could not be located. CNA D has been employed at the facility since 09/2019. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jun 11, 2025

    Based on observation, interview and policy review, the facility did not prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Staff were observed not allowing thermometer to dry prior to checking temperatures of food items and not inverting mixer and bowls in storage. This had the potential to affect all 49 residents in the facility. Findings: Example 1 On 06/08/25 at 10:45 AM, Surveyor conducted the initial tour of kitchen with [NAME] T who has been on staff 12 years. Surveyor observed the Kitchen Aide mixer on the counter with bowl under it that was not inverted. Surveyor also observed large industrial size mixer in kitchen with bowl stored under it which was not inverted. Neither of the mixers were covered. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF851Jun 11, 2025

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure accurate reporting of the mandatory submission of staffing information based on payroll data to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). The facility failed to enter accurate data in their Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) system from 7/1/24 - 3/31/25 which triggered excessively low weekend staffing. This has the potential to affect all 49 residents residing in the facility. This is evidenced by: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Electronic Staffing Data Submission Payroll-Based Journal, Long-term Care Facility Policy Manual, dated June 2022, states in part: Chapter 1: Overview, 1.1 introduction .(U) mandatory submission of staffing information based on payroll data in a uniform format. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812May 2, 2024

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Staff were observed not wearing covering over facial hair while preparing and serving food in the kitchen. This had the potential to affect all 46 residents in the facility. Findings include: According to the FDA Food Code 2022 documents at 2-402.11 Hair restraints: Effectiveness. (A) Except as provided in (B) of this section, food employees shall wear hair restraints such as hats, hair coverings or nets, beard restraints, and clothing that covers body hair, that are designed and worn to effectively keep their hair from contacting exposed food, clean equipment, utensils and linens and unwrapped single service and… […]

Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 119 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 30, 2025Complaint4 findings
  • Jun 11, 2025Standard and complaint12 findings
  • Feb 26, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 14, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • May 2, 2024Standard4 findings
  • Apr 26, 2023Standard2 findings
  • May 26, 2022Complaint4 findings
  • Feb 10, 2022Standard12 findings
Show the 14 earlier surveys
  • Apr 26, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 12, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 28, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Mar 4, 2020Standard3 findings
  • Apr 17, 2019Standard2 findings
  • Mar 20, 2018Standard3 findings
  • Apr 19, 2017Standard and complaint11 findings · 3 harm
  • Mar 15, 2016Standard12 findings
  • Mar 26, 2015Standard7 findings
  • Apr 16, 2014Standard12 findings · 1 harm
  • Feb 19, 2013—16 findings
  • Dec 14, 2011—5 findings
  • Mar 10, 2011—4 findings
  • Jan 11, 2011—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction