Windsor Lane Healthcare Center
Gibsonburg, Ohio · CCN 365681
45 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2021.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 154
- Surveys
- 45
- Harm or worse
- 3
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 89
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Sandusky · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1986
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 391 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Ohio.
Last survey on record
Feb 27, 2026
255 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.32 | 3.47 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.47 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 39.8% | 49.2% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Abuse icon
- Flagged by CMS on Care Compare
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G12.4% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D3583.3% | E24.8% | F12.4% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C37.1% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6894×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F6563×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F6843×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F6923×
Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
- F6002×
Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Windsor Lane Healthcare Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Dec 11, 2024
Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, review of a facility investigation including written statements, review of facility camera footage, hospital documentation review, review of a manufacture operating manual, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure specialized chairs were utilized in a safe and proper manner to prevent injuries. Actual Harm occurred when Resident #01 was placed in a Broda chair (a supportive positioning chair which allows residents to tilt and recline) equipped with caster type wheels and Resident #01 was left unattended while seated in the chair, which was not assessed for use, with the caster wheels unlocked. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF687Dec 5, 2022
Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to monitor skin as care planned, complete skin assessments, and monitor a resident's wound. This resulted in actual harm when a diabetic foot ulcer was discovered at an outside podiatrist appointment, which resulted in amputation of the right great toe, eleven days after discovery. This affected one (Resident #47) of three residents reviewed for non-pressure wounds. The facility census was 68. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #47 was admitted on [DATE]. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Feb 25, 2021
Based on medical record review, observation, policy review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide supervision and implemented the physician ordered safety interventions to prevent falls. This resulted in actual harm when Resident #3 fell from his wheelchair and suffered a left [MEDICAL CONDITION]. This affected one (#3) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility identified 11 residents at risk for falls. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an admission date of [DATE], with [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments dated 01/07/21 revealed Resident #3 was severely cognitively impaired. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Jan 27, 2022
Based on review of the employee COVID-19 testing records, review of employee time cards, review of the COVID screening forms, staff interviews, epidemiologist interview, review of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff followed return to work guidelines and failed to implement additional staffing strategies to prevent the potential spread of [CONDITION(S)]-Co-V-2 (COVID-19). This had the potential to affect 64 of 64 residents who reside in the facility. The facility census was 64. Findings include: Review of employee testing records revealed Dietary Staff (DS) #122 tested positive for [CONDITION(S)]-CoV-2 (COVID-19) on 01/12/22. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Apr 15, 2021
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, review of the COVID-19 Nursing Home data website, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC) guidance, the facility failed to implement infection control and prevention measures to prevent the spread of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), the facility failed to ensure staff was wearing eye protection when caring for residents and also failed to wear the proper personal protective equipment (PPE) when entering a droplet isolation room. This had the potential to affect 57 of 57 residents in the facility. The facility census was 57. Findings include: 1) Observation on 04/14/21 at 6:04 A.M. […]
Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 154 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Feb 27, 2026Complaint2 findings
- Dec 29, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Sep 10, 2025Complaint3 findings
- Dec 11, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Nov 22, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Jul 25, 2024Standard13 findings
- Feb 27, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Aug 24, 2023Complaint2 findings
Show the 37 earlier surveys
- Jan 19, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Dec 5, 2022Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 27, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Nov 24, 2021Standard and complaint10 findings
- Aug 31, 2021Complaint2 findings
- Jul 1, 2021Complaint1 finding
- May 10, 2021Complaint4 findings
- Apr 15, 2021Complaint2 findings
- Feb 25, 2021Infection control8 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 28, 2021Complaint2 findings
- Nov 24, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Jun 30, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Mar 14, 2020Complaint4 findings
- Dec 15, 2019Complaint4 findings
- Nov 27, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Oct 3, 2019Complaint1 finding
- May 22, 2019Standard and complaint8 findings
- Apr 15, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Feb 27, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Jan 14, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Dec 26, 2018Complaint6 findings
- Jul 11, 2018Complaint3 findings
- May 17, 2018Standard12 findings
- Feb 10, 2018Complaint4 findings
- Aug 30, 2017Complaint3 findings
- Aug 21, 2017Complaint2 findings
- Jul 20, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Mar 30, 2017Standard9 findings
- Oct 4, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Dec 17, 2015Standard and complaint6 findings
- Sep 18, 2014Standard5 findings
- Jun 25, 2013—6 findings
- Jun 15, 2013Complaint2 findings
- Jan 15, 2013—1 finding
- Apr 12, 2012—7 findings
- Mar 1, 2012—1 finding
- Oct 12, 2010—2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction